I forgot that the Mets offered arby, which would complicate matters, but giving up one pick wouldn't be the end of the world, especially when 5 comp picks are likely coming the Brewers' way. And Perez was outpitched by Looper by the barest of margins in 2008 (102 ERA+ for Looper vs. 100 for Perez in 5 more innings for Looper). However, the scale is massively tilted in Perez's favor by the facts that he's 7 years younger than Looper and has had stretches (twice including whole seasons) of dominance as a starter. I don't know, I just don't see how picking up an average-ish guy to replace a possibly 5% below average guy (McClung) is going to help the team much. Sure, the Brewers will likely need a 6th or 7th starter at some point, but guys like Claudio Vargas can be had for free pretty much every year. There's no need to pay a premium for so small of an upgrade, imo. The money should be used for a more drastic upgrade, or, if none can be found, banked for when one can be found. Perez may not be much of an upgrade either, but he at least offers the possibility of being one, unlike Looper. I don't think (in any sport) that you win by paying average guys large salaries. You win by paying great players big salaries and filling in around them with young guys and fill-ins. Look at, for example, the Celtics or the Cardinals when they won recently- they paid their good players big money and filled in around them with moderate cost vets and cheap kids. Suppan looks a lot better at $4 million per on the Cards than he does at $11 million per on the Brewers.