For all the talk that the franchise needs to find and develop quality, young (cheap) starting pitching, the 2012 team rallied in the second half based on a core of quality, young starting pitching prospects (Fiers - 3.74 ERA, 1.26 WHIP; Peralta - 2.48 ERA, 1.21 WHIP; Rogers - 3.92 ERA, 1.28 WHIP; Thornburg - 4.50 ERA, 1.41 WHIP). We, as fans, hoped that all of these players would make positive improvements, and make positive contributions to the 2013 Brewers. Unfortunately, young pitchers (particularly those with small major league samples) can also be erratic, and every single one of them has regressed this season. Their ERAs are closer to 6 than 3 (including Thornburg's ERA in AAA ball). The less said about Rogers in 2013, the better. Granted, none of these players are "can't miss" prospects, but I do believe that one or more of these pitchers (and I will lump Burgos in with them, even though he did not pitch for the big club in 2012) can come closer to their 2012 performances in 2013. I think there will be a net improvement in the offense with Hart's return (and any regression to the mean by Weeks and Lucroy to be balanced out by similar regression by players like Gomez and Segura). I don't think this year's team is a playoff team, if only because they have let a number of winnable games fall by the wayside, and I don't think they are good enough to catch up in the 2nd half like they nearly did last year. I do trust DM to get value for players, even if the return isn't always as immediately obvious as the Grienke trade. I'm just not willing to write off the franchise because of a bad 1/3rd of a season. I'm watching just as much baseball this year as I did in 2012, 2011, 2010....to well into the 90s. (I didn't watch as much baseball before that....because they didn't televise nearly as many games then; that's what radio was for!) I am disappointed in this year's team...but who wouldn't be?