From July 5th IGT: I'm not picking on turborickey, because this is a very common comment when Sedar does something good or bad, so I thought it would make a good (lively) discussion point. Watching this game, I saw the play that evoked this comment: Braun was at second and got a late break on a single through the left side of the infield (waiting for it to go through). Surprisingly, Sedar sent Braun home even though the LF was in shallow left picking up the ball (Braun was surprised too). I thought Braun was toast, but the LF was off the mark and Braun scored easily. So I've been thinking about this lately. Of course, we all hate outs made at home, but if Sedar only sends people when there is a 100% chance of scoring, he is preventing runs from scoring. Stopping someone at third base means that someone else needs a hit, walk, bunt, PB, WP, or other "success" to score. So, the success rater of Sedar sending players should be balanced with their chances of scoring from third if they are stopped. So I wonder if anyone keeps those metrics? I would imagine internally, the Brewers are doing that, but I've not heard anyone posting them publicly. I found this article, which shows Sedar as one of the most aggressive 3B coaches in 2014, but still doesn't compare the rate of scoring to the chances of scoring from third if he stops them. I'm not saying Sedar is good or bad as a 3B coach, but curious about the statistics behind his play.