1. Draft reports are typically accurate, Poor choice of words on my part. I meant more along the lines that carrying over those scouted tools (especially FB speed) into the minors tends to be a difficult task. Heckathorn's a good example of that. 2. Having success in AA and AAA is nice, but in reality, if you aren't toolsy enough to succeed in the big leagues Tools aren't the only way someone succeeds in the majors. It sure helps, but there are plenty of examples of successful non-toolsy guys and plenty of toolsy failures. Plus at some point, you have to put up good numbers. Braddock wouldn't have gotten a chance at the MLB level if he continually put up a mid-5 ERA in the minors. At some point potential must become production. Also, I was comparing toolsy low-level players vs. lower-tool upper level. Comparing two guys on the same level adds more wrinkles. I don't think Davis is an impact player in the MLB. That's fair. Its a mixed bag on the forum (made obvious by this thread). But to leave him off a list of 50, especially with our system is grossly underrating him. If he's going to play either of those positions, he's going to have to really, really hit. Any reason to think that way? He has done nothing but hit since he arrived. Plus, his prospect status shouldn't rest on who is ahead of him. His defense is a sure limitation, but that should make him the ideal Brewer prospect! http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/wink.gif