I'm completely lost in the whole "value" argument that seems so prevalent when talking about moving players around (Hall, Weeks, Hardy). Yes, I understand he will be less above the average 3B than he is above the average SS. But the goal is the field the best team possible. If we could swap JJ for a 3B with a better bat and equal D, then yeah lets do that. But chances are, it won't happen. Chance are, our best option is to move JJ to 3B or 2B (again, I agree Escobar is still one year away), then who cares about "value". Our best option is our best option. If we get a great trade for him, then fine. If not, he is an above average 3B (in defense, power, and OBP), but for 2010 instead. You can't always trade people so they are in their best position. Sometimes you make do with what you have. Edit: Removed quote from JJHardy7 - misread the quote.