I was thinking about the baseball vs. football thing last night and trying to figure out how baseball would sound if announcers broke down the plays like they do in football. One some of the better broadcasts, you will see a breakdown of pitches. But rarely do you see them talking about the route someone took to a fly ball. Or the footwork in turning a double play. Seems like the time between plays in football is very well used to explain what the offense/defense IS doing or what they SHOULD be doing. Couple other general thoughts: - Football is generally more popular. Simply because baseball is an expensive sport (you need a field big enough, ball, bat and every kid needs a glove). Football, you only need the ball. Even backyards are big enough to play some type of game. Kind of like watching kids play soccer in less fortunate countries. Sometimes, they don't even have a ball, just a rolled up wad of paper. - Whoever said football requires beer hasn't been to a baseball game lately! If it weren't for beer, the Cubs would only have 1/2 their attendance! http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif - Definately agree with needing patience for baseball. Baseball is a more relaxing game. Best served in person. Football is a more hype game, so many times the TV broadcast is just as good or better than live (although if I ever sat at the 50 YL, I might change my mind...). Just to see better angles, instant replays, etc... Personally, I'm a fan of both. Not die-hard, but not casual either. I watched a little last night. About the same as the WS last year. If the Brewers or Packers aren't playing, I'm more of a casual fan.