not sure laziness, as much as it is difficult to generate a top XX list, even as we do here. Currently we have a good consensus top 5-6, then about 8-12 players in the next tier who could really be anywhere in that list, then in our system another 15-20 players who are about equal. I don't know that putting Matos at #27 vs off the list but is likely #35 is that different in the grand scheme. And pedigree does count a lot.
We see players struggle, but top draft picks and high bonus payment IFA/DSL guys get a lot more leeway in the organization, and scouting sites will also rely on that, as the team clearly valued Rodriguez a lot to give that bonus, and like with Antunez last year, a slower year doesn't mean a lower status in the future. Cairone is a tough one as he would likely be a top 20 prospect based upon pedigree, and he is pitching only 6 months removed from a life-threatening illness, so a lot of variability. But if he is fully back and regains all his prior stuff he could be a top 10-15 talent. But if not, he falls off the list ultimately.
The part that we overlook here (Myself included) is how deep the pool really is.
10 years ago, we could agree on a top 10, the next 10 were fine, and the last 10 were filled with guys who had to be there (top picks, or players have a good season that was maybe a breakout, or those with some tools).. Now even our 15-30 players have tools and production and many with pedigree as well. No longer is Caden Lemons or Larry Ernesto on a list because of signing bonus despite no/limited production.