Here is my simple argument for those that think the Braun extension was a bad idea (not that you're wrong, because of risk): If not Braun, then what player can the Brewers extend for that long? If the answer is no one, then I believe the Brewers should probably have gone for a team-building strategy similar to the Tampa Bay Rays (or what Kansas City is trying to do) and build up entirely from cheap, young players (Again, not a bad strategy). If that was the case, then the Brewers never should have traded for Greinke and Marcum, and should probably be trying to deal Braun away now, so as to stock pile more young, controllable players. The problem with that strategy is that it is not that much fun in the interim for the fans, and would erode the excellent fan-base already established, plus the reward might only come around once in a blue moon, or every 16 years or so. While I approve of building up young, controllable talent, I believe it needs to be supplemented with established elite talent like Braun. If Braun approaches the Brewers about an extension, and they decline, it might not do much for retaining any talent longer than their arby years in the future, especially in a market such as Milwaukee. I believe the Brewers have already tried this approach, and that window has closed. Eventually, I believe that the team needs to take a chance to stay competitive or the Brewers will see another few decades of .500 or lower seasons.