Why? Every year in the middle of the college football season people start chirping about how they need expanded playoffs, and every year by the end of the season everything shakes out so that there are four deserving teams and no teams left out that aren't deserving. This year you have five teams in consideration - Alabama, Georgia, Michigan, Cincinnati, and Notre Dame and Cincinnati beat Notre Dame. Notre Dame only played one school that finished the year ranked and they lost to them. Really, who else deserves to be in this year? If the argument is non-Power 5 teams should be included, I agree - but that doesn't mean expansion, that means put an undefeated non-Power 5 team in the 4-team playoff. I pretty much laid out my reasoning in the rest of my post, but here's a reminder. I want to see each conference champion get a shot at it so that they all matter, and I don't want to see the sec championship not matter. I don't know how you can say that both Alabama and Georgia are both deserving just because they are swc schools when the criticism of both of them are their soft schedules. I do think Utah, Baylor, and Pittsburgh are all deserving, and it's fine if you disagree, but that's my opinion. Specifically looking at Utah, they destroyed Oregon twice and you would probably say that Oregon has a huge talent advantage between the 2, yet that's basically why Georgia would get picked over them, they are better on paper.