Somehow I don't think the Dodgers are ready to dump an .850 OPS outfielder for a guy who was one of the worst starters in the entire league last year. Ethier is a bad contract, but he was almost a 3 WAR player, so it's not like he doesn't provide something to the team he's on. Yes, the Dodgers have a glut of OF, but so do we, and getting rid of a bad contract to take on another big contract at a position that's not a need doesn't make a lot of sense. Crawford was actually negative WAR last year, and is owed more than Ethier. I'm not in favor or against acquiring a bad contract for Garza but there's no reason that acquired bad contract can't be "Arroyo-ed" to get a prospect or even Garza himself.