Interesting tidbit there that I bolded. If it is true that Braun's name can't be connect to PED's but still connected to the clinic, does MLB think they can really get away with suspending him? you should read this thread from the start, that has been debated some already in better detail than what i'll say. Tested positive or otherwise violates the program by use or possession of a performance enhancing drug will be subject to penalty. so they dont have to prove that he USED PED's, they just have to show that Braun, and his money records in question, are connected to possession of PED's. Your last sentence is the point I was trying to make. According to the report I posted Braun's name is only connected to owing money, not PED's. Yes, it would make sense that if he owes money to a guy selling PED's then he probably was buying, but Braun or his lawyer (can't remember which) has already said we paid him for consulting. If there is no evidence to connect Braun to buying PED's, only to owing money, then there shouldn't be any grounds for suspending him.