CONTINUED DISCUSSION FROM THE LOCKED JEFRESS THREAD IN TRANSACTIONS & RUMORS Sure. I agree that you have to look at the value at what was received back at the time. But you have no clue other than pure speculation as to what those prospects could have brought back other than Greinke. So at the time, the assigned value of those prospects, gave the Brewers Greinke. Could the Brewers have acquired more? You don't know and neither do I. Your wanting to look at the moment rather than look back in hindsight is being done to serve your argument's purpose as the Brewers currently have players that are better than any of those prospects at all of those positions. Escobar became Segura. That is a fact. The FO traded a group of assets (prospects) for another asset (Greinke). When that asset couldn't be retained, it was traded for another asset (Segura). Marcum and Sabathia have no relevance to this discussion and are completely unrelated. The opportunity costs you speak of...what are those? Moves that could have been made had the Brewers held Brantley, Lawrie, Cain, Jeffress, Odorizzi and Escobar? What trades are those? Or do you mean the Brewers could have had that team in 2009-2013? Again, this is pure speculation on your part as to what the Brewers could have been with an everyday lineup comprised of Lawrie, Escobar, Cain and Brantley. Cain would have been the starter in CF had the Greinke trade not occurred. I firmly believe that. However, having Gomez allowed the Brewers to part with Cain in the Greinke trade. An opportunity arose and the Brewers took it and it paid off handsomely as Cain has never lived up to expectations, whereas Gomez has. "I'll take my chances with toolsy players who are excellent defenders and hope they can ascend offensively, at least through arbitration"...did you just describe Carlos Gomez? Yes. Yuni stunk. Marcum trade...exceptionally shortsighted. You and I agree there. Do I wish the FO had acquired a younger arm with higher upside than Marcum? Absolutely. Um...What? Looper was signed for 2009, Davis and Wolf for 2010, Lohse for 2013...did I miss some big trade of a young arm by the Brewers? Odorizzi, the only pitching prospect dealt, was still in the organization for every one of those signings save Lohse. The Brewers have not dealt a pitching prospect that has turned into anything in the time period you are referencing unless you count Rob Bryson and Zack Jackson in the Sabathia deal. Sheets blew his arm out, the Brewers went as far as they could with Sabathia to meet his $ demands. You and I absolutely agree on how best to build a team and I agree with this philosophy. I typically enjoy the posts you make because they are well researched and informative. The issue I took with this one is the fact that it is implied that the Brewers didn't maximize their assets and the argument is based on speculation. The only asset that we have a firm report on (to my knowledge) that likely wasn't maximized was Lawrie when the reports of opposing GMs not knowing he was available surfaced. However, the other assets you mentioned, we had no clue as to what was offered. The only way we as fans can judge trades is in hindsight. A perfect example is the JJ Hardy-Carlos Gomez trade, which I despised at the time. However, this is the perfect example of how hindsight gives us clarity on a deal as both players have thrived in different environments (granted Hardy's wasn't in Minnesota). Playing armchair GM in the moment is great for message boards, but in reality doesn't show the whole picture. If we know what all the options on the table are (i.e. what trade packages were offered for Lawrie, Escobar, Odorizzi, Jeffress, Brantley), it would be fair to say whether the Brewers maximized their assets' value. However, our only barometer as to the success of a deal as fans is hindsight. Go Brewers