No Brewers appeared in the #31-#40 spots. In the honorable mention section they listed 15 players that made the top 50 last year, but aren’t returning to this year’s list. So far through the first 20 spots that have been unveiled (#31-#50), 11 of them did not make last year’s list. That is a long winded way of pointing out that there are only four players remaining that didn’t appear on last year’s top 50 that will make this year’s version of the list. Regarding Hader, if you look at the Baseball Trade Values website list of all players, Hader ranks #85 overall. By comparison, Woodruff ranks #41 and Hiura ranks #43 for Baseball Trade Values. Having said that, last year the FanGraphs trade value exercise had a decent amount of variance from the Baseball Trade Values site. I think the differences are in part impacted by the methodology of each. They are similar in some aspects such as weighting the contracts and years of control remaining. The biggest difference as I understand it is the Baseball Trade Values site attempts to reverse engineer past trades/transactions to help set the market for future trade values, while the FanGraphs list does rely on their contacts across the industry as well as those with individual organizations to assist with drafting and reviewing their list. The latter is probably open to a little heavier dose of anecdotal feedback, but it’s also tough to argue with hearing feedback straight from the horse’s mouth.