JosephC - Hilarious. I've been guilty of buying into the sudden prospect helium more times than I would like to admit. As nate82 mentioned, I am certain front offices are much better at taking the long-view (and less game results based) when it comes to prospect valuation. As is often said, player development is not a linear path. Brew crew 92 - If you don't believe the site's valuations are very accurate that is fine, and I think you have expressed that in multiple posts now so everyone should have a pretty good sense of where you stand on it. Obviously the values given to players are never going to be 100% accurate and will even carry significant variance from each organization's internal player scouting evaluations. I don't think the website is making claims they've created some type of full-proof blanket system that can't be argued or adjusted. It should be used more as a guide to get a general sense of player's ballpark value. In many cases factors beyond just straight value will enter the equation (i.e. organizational needs; roster construction; a team's competitive cycle; etc). If you want to criticize their product I would encourage you to gain an understanding of the methodology and what they are actually attempting to accomplish. A good start would be to go back and listen to the podcast that was linked in the initial post. They are updating the values of MLB players daily. I don't know how often they are updating prospect values, but I can certainly understand the difficulties that would present. As others mentioned, front offices aren't typically going to put much stock in a couple of months of counting stats, either. There is also always going to be a wide variance of scouting opinions on prospects, so that will certainly remain a challenge for them. That being said, I don't think their current values are as wild as you are making them out to be. Teams have much better information than what is publicly available, so the website will never be perfect. What it will hopefully provide is some sense of whether a potential trade is within the realm of possibility or or not from a value standpoint. As they discussed on the podcast, one of the true tests will be reviewing their numbers as actual trades occur. That will present an opportunity to going back and view how close or far off they were from matching up in estimated value. As trades occur this month I will take a look at what the website had the various players valued at and post the comparison in this thread.