Advanced stats are great. They do help tell a story. But they can, and seem to be, misleading often. I can tell you what my eyes have seen. Jeffress, as a Brewer, goes out and gets the job done. Drake, it is a crapshoot, and usually pretty scary while doing it. He might end up being a good pen guy for us but so far, he's been very hard to watch. You're basing that on what happened 2 years ago. Jeffress clearly is not that player anymore. He has a few good/lucky outings last year, without any improvement in the numbers that actually predict future performance, and everyone is ready to hand him the keys. I'm not saying Drake is as good as him, but the idea that Drake should be DFA'ed after walking two RHB's against a good team when he's a damn LOOGY in the first place (and a good one, in a pen that needs one with Boone out) while Jeffress should be the closer is blatant favoritism for a formerly successful Brewer. Jeffress is a middle of the pack guy at best and Drake is a good LOOGY. Anybody except a Brewer fan who's still nostalgic about Jeffress in 2016 and pissed off at Drake for a handful of runs at a bad time last year in this can see that. Has nothing to do with nostalgia for me. He did the job last year and he's begun another season of getting the job done. Meanwhile, Drake is shaky, pretty much always. I don't want him in our bullpen as he has blow up written all over him. I want consistency. I'm not making a case for Jeffress to close, never have. But when comparing the two, it's not as close as you want to make it.