Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't most free-agent pitcher about "that age?" Since they can't be free-agent until after 6 years in the bigs, and many pitchers reach the big at age 24, on average, then wouldn't most (note: I didn't say all) free-agent pitchers be, on average, 30 years old (or older, with a sprinkling of younger ones)? With that said, 31 years old for Lackey is not all that bad. Plus, look at all the top-notch pitchers that have continued to pitch well into their mid-30s. Yes, he has an injury history but he's the best there is this season in a very weak free-agent market. Next year is supposedly a much better year for free-agency. But won't that also mean that the big-market teams will be gobbling up those players even faster with even bigger offers that Milwaukee won't be able to top? I fear that the 2010 free-agency period (next November thru January) is going to be rough for the Brewers to get any of those bigger-named free-agents because of this. I hope that I am wrong. On topic, I'm pretty glad that they got rid of Looper, too. He was servicable but he just allowed too many long balls, in my opinion. And offered them up in the most inopportune times (I still can't believe he gave up that big lead in Florida back in June.) I think we all knew he was going to be average at best but more likely mediocre; and that's what we got. I've heard he's a heck of a guy, though so I hope that everything works out for him. I'm sure he will land a job. Whether it is Kansas City or Pittsburgh is the question. But don't be surprised if he were to return to St. Louis in one way or another.