hmmm, this is a very good topic. I'm sure some of it is that players (i.e. free-agents) have a desire to go to a town with a baseball history (recent and long-past), have a history of great fans (whether they are or not is truly up for debate), have perennially good weather (that's debatable, too, depending on your personal definition of "good weather"), and whatever intangible there may be. But that doesn't answer the question of trades. I still would like to know how Oakland feels now that Holliday is raking the way he is. Sure, he had no protection in Oakland, but he played seriously uninspired baseball until the trade. St. Louis is technically considered a "small-market," by definition. At least, I believe that I read that somewhere. But the money flows like milk and honey. It probably helps that they have a steady income stream from a profitable television contract and a fan base that stretches out throughout the midwest in all directions. Who knows? Maybe they hire a hypnotist or something. Maybe they take all the real players and lock them up in a dungeon while their cyborg dopelganger takes the field night after night (see ESPN Pujols commercial.) Then, when they cut a player or trade him or whatever, they release the real guy to the new team while destroying the android. This is indeed a baffling case. You could say the same thing about several teams, I think. But I know and understand how you feel, AJAY. The Cardinals do, indeed, have some sort of magic to them. And it is very perplexing. It doesn't bug me much that they are a good team as it does me wondering how the Brewers could get to that level. Maybe someday, we'll see this kind of thing in Milwaukee. I've got to think about this some more. I might have more to say tomorrow.