Control (very few walks) and inducing ground balls (even in last night's start, he had 8 groundouts to 2 fly outs). Honestly, I will see what a larger sample size does. Suter had a rough April in Colorado Springs, then was lights out. In any case, I'd rather pay league minimum for Suter than eight figures for Garza or seven figures for Anderson or Peralta (although Peralta has pitched well since his return from the minors). I don't think anyone here is a Garza or Anderson fan. I have no idea why either is here in the first place. Garza is just a relic of the keep it barely competitive Mark A strategy and Anderson never should have been aquired, as he offers no purpose. Peralta I'd rather fight thru his issues because they guy does have talent. I have no problem giving Suter a chance the rest of the year, I was just asking what made him somewhat successful because he doesn't fit the profile of a pitcher who will get guys out up here.