I'm just spitballing, but I wonder if something with more players involved that included Nelson on our end would tempt them, since it would solve that problem. At that point, I'm not sure it's even worth it for us. I realize the mere thought of dealing their top prospect might be something the Nationals wouldn't even entertain. I do think to a degree some GMs overvalue prospects. As good as Gioloto is, there is no guarantee of him coming up and becoming a Kershaw or an Arrieta. I believe Rickie Weeks was a top 5 prospect at one time. Sometimes it just doesn't translate at the MLB level the way GMs hope. That said, I know the cost-controlled element of a prospect adds a great deal to their perceived value. I think Nelson would be the prime sell high candidate. He is pitching like a true #2, he is under team control through 2020, he is still young at 26 years old, and is still cheap. Sadly, most expect that the Brewers rebuild will last at least until 2018. This means that his 2016, 2017, and 2018 campaigns will be lost to the rebuild. Then you have to hope he is still healthy and productive in 2019. If a Nelson/Braun or Nelson/Lucroy package can bring you back the moon, I think you have to at least consider it. I dont think the Nats would put Giolito on the table. But if a team were to offer 3 or 4 legit top 100ish pitching prospects I think Stearns would have to at least consider. Off the top of my head, I believe Texas and Philidelphia are the only two teams with farm systems stocked enough to do such a deal.