Sure there is. I don't know anything about the school but if this was a violation of a pre-existing policy they can suspend the kid. Going viral itself can't be the reason, and the principal looks like a doofus, but this absolutist statement just isn't fair. The kid can be doing the right thing and still be justifiably suspended. I remember when I was in HS a bunch of kids got detention for 'walking out' to protest the Iraq War. It's not quite the same, but there is still a reason she can be suspended. Sure there is probably some rule or policy to justify it...probably always is. That isn’t really the point. No school, even if within policy, is going to suspend a kid because they share a photo they took during school. Realistically any reasonable school is going to give a verbal warning of, “hey don’t do that again” and explain it. A crummy school is going to punish them in some form that isn’t suspending them. To suspend them in this case is beyond pathetic and the school is taking out their own failure on a student for calling them out. The administration should be ashamed (they probably aren’t) and community members shoulder be furious. Getting suspended from school is essentially max punishment for a student. Taking a picture is not grounds for max punishment...especially in the length they got. I don’t know about other districts, but any I have been apart of or know of that length of a suspension is pretty dang hefty. If they did this constantly or if it was a bad/offensive/inappropriate picture then sure...suspension. However, we all know why this student got suspended and it wasn’t really taking a picturing....it’s because the school got offended because the student made them look bad.