The analytics movement has been going on for years. It hasn't changed the calculus on this subject one iota. Not every tradition is incorrect. Yeah, that tired argument about "why wouldn't he want to go to a contender" gets asked every year. Why would a guy sign a five year deal with a marginal team if he wanted to ensure he was playing for a contender. Condescension aside, the point was that jobber organizations pull jobber moves by trading away players one year into a LTC. At the end of the day the Cain contract is more of the same. Paying a guy for what he did in the past while full well knowing you are going to be paying negative value by the end of the deal. Business as usual. Huh? The circumstances under which he was singed are in the past, they don't change based on future results. Further, I'm sure both Cain and the Brewers FO are well aware of the possible outcomes for the season and said contract was singed with that full knowledge. If Cain performs then it was a good signing, if he doesn't then its not a good signing. The overall team performance is not going to determine whether it was a good sign or not. Bottom line, even through I am not a huge supporter of the signing given how things played out, Cain isn't going anywhere after this year and he shouldn't.