Considering Weeks has gone from weak on turning the DP to fast and accurate, and just threw out a runner at the plate the other day on a play only the strongest armed 2B would make, I'd say that borders on absurd, or is a tiny sample that will work itself out. The defensive metrics have taken a huge hit on reliability of late, with Jason Bay being changed from awful to above average, and the most recent comments that a season of defense is too small a sample to care about, that you have to use 3 year averages (in effect, making it impossible to gauge a player until 450 games in the majors). I'm still of the opinion they exaggerate everything a bit, because if 90% of the players were between +10 runs and -10 runs a year, few would care. I know Adam Dunn is bad, and so is Brad Hawpe, but -30+ for a corner OF, when on average they have 1.5 chances a game, is beyond mathematical common sense.