Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Jopal78

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,340

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jopal78

  1. Jopal78
    No, it’s exactly what I said. Your anecdotal experience aside, Bisaccia was born in 1960 started coaching down south in the SEC in 1988 and remained there until joining the Buccaneers in 2002. LaFleur was still a child in Michigan at the time. By the time LaFleur was getting into college coaching, Bisaccia was in the NFL with Tampa Bay. It’s not the age itself, it’s lack of connections and different stations in life .
  2. Jopal78
    Gary has 46.5 sacks in 106 games. By comparison, Vonnie Holliday had 32 sacks in 66 games for Green Bay. KGB had 74.5 in 124 career games. Aaron Kampman had 54 in 104 games as a Packer. Preston Smith had 44 sacks in 91 games with Green Bay. Gary must never “want to play”, or alternatively he isn’t much of a pass rusher when compared to recent good but not great Packer pass rushers.
  3. Jopal78
    It’s an internet message board. If you think I take anything written here by people I’ve never met personally , you’re reading way too much into the words. Do I like debating well organized and thought out posts that are clearly wrong, yes. All kidding aside, I’m glad you have maintained friendships with those folks from your athletic days. However, I don’t know what your anecdotal experience has to do with anything. If you have an article or something other than fan speculation that LaFleur and Bisaccia had a personal relationship before 2022, I’d like to see it. If the Packers want to look in the mirror realize they’re not good enough and hit the reset button by firing both the coach and GM, I’m all for it. But to fire LaFleur because they think they’re an elite team and his decision making is failing the talent they have, isn’t being honest.
  4. Jopal78
    I get it too, you’re looking for something to blame besides the talent for their failure in meeting your expectations. That’s why you’ve criticized LaFleur as having “friends” as assistant coaches. Specifically, Bisaccia is 66 years old, he’s old enough to be LaFleur’s dad, and they’ve never worked together before 2022. Best Friends? I doubt it. What is fact is outside Sean Mannion none of the assistant coaches had worked with LaFleur before being hired in GB. Further Bisaccia when hired in ‘22 had been a special teams coach in the pros since 2002 and has a Super Bowl ring. And he almost certainly is going to get canned despite that pedigree. If you dont like the guy, just say it. If you want to blame losses on assistant coaches, just say it. Blaming your disappointment on the HC “hiring friends” is nonsense.
  5. Jopal78
    He does lead that article off saying LaFleur is a good coach. But also is critical that LaFleur didn’t try Willis for a change of pace, so maybe what Silverstein writes is largely ignored anyways, and probably should be with those kind of arguments.
  6. Jopal78
    Yeah, there’s 17 games in a season. Who cares where they were positioned in Week 14? The NFC North Champs beat them straight up on a botched onside kick, and a long touchdown pass in overtime. That their defense without Parsons was amongst the worst in the league makes it indisputable the talent on that side of the ball isn’t very good. If you want to go metrics, their defense already negative expected points in 7 of 13 games WITH Parsons and in every single game without him. They gave up nearly 400 yards in the last five games of the year. They should take a good look in the mirror, they were a 7 seed who got in the playoffs in a watered down conference, then got bounced after being shredded for 450 yards and 31 points. What do timeouts & game management have to do with that (I’m sure they would’ve liked to eat the clock in the 2nd have, but having a washed up veteran and 2 UFDAs at RB, and a mediocre OL didn’t allow them to do that— not play calling)?
  7. Jopal78
    Clearly, the Packers don’t have as much talent as they’d have people believe. They have nobody at RB, CB, K. Outside of Parsons they have no pass rushers. Look at the roster and ask yourself honestly what position group in Green Bay is better than most teams? How did that manifest itself in the game? They couldn’t run the ball with Jacobs making them one dimensional. Johnson had no respect for the defense at all and never punted once on 4th down. If you want to criticize LaFleur because he’s the HC and ultimately bears responsibility for losses and inability to get special teams right. Fine. But firing him because expectations were that a fringe 7 seed (4-2 in their division, 5-5-1 against everyone else) would do better in the playoffs is a knee jerk reaction.
  8. Jopal78
    What’s he going to do when his RB1 (Jacobs) has a single 13 yard run then averages 2.5 yards a carry the other 18 times he carries the ball? Who are the other ball carriers? A couple of undrafted guys. That’s why Love threw the ball nearly 50 times
  9. Jopal78
    Of course he gets an extension. What are they going to do, get John Harbaugh who is even further removed from consistent success in the NFL? Get some coach to squeeze even more production out of their QB?? I could be wrong but I don’t think there is some sort of “Buck stops here” mentality where LaFleur gets canned for failings if his underlings. Bisaccia gets fired, maybe Hafley leaves but the offense rolling up 27 points and 431 yards isn’t really why they lost.
  10. Jopal78
    The Packers QB threw 46 passes, with 323 yards and 4TDs. I agree Jacobs is a stiff and made them one dimensional. But time of possession was 27 minutes to 32 minutes. With 11 possessions for the Packers and 10 for the Bears. Hafley had no answers for the scramble drill by Willaims all season long, and McManus missed 3 kicks that NFL kickers should make
  11. Jopal78
    Not spin. The loss was on the defense and McManus, and the inability to run the football
  12. Jopal78
    Yeah, but they put up 431 yards and Love threw for 4 scores, and Williams gave them 2 turnovers. Defense and Special Teams handed them the loss.
  13. Jopal78
    The Packers defense got torched for 451 yards and 31 points. Thats not on LaFleur; that’s Hafley’s unit folding like a cheap suit. I think it’s fair to criticize LaFleur for the inability to get the special teams to be competent, and Bisaccia will surely be gone.
  14. Jopal78
    Hahaha
  15. Jopal78
    The irony they hung with McManus all year when an injury replacement hits a franchise record field goal, only to have McManus cost them a playoff game
  16. Jopal78
    Maybe they can give Crosby his job back
  17. Jopal78
    McManus has cost them 4 points.
  18. Jopal78
    Levine is a big nothing-burger. He didn’t make the final decisions in Minnesota. While he may not have made the decision to extend the players he did play a role in handing out a pile of terrible contracts: Miguel Sano, Josh Donaldson, Kenta Maeda, and Buxton - massive portion of payroll tied to theoretical value rather than availability. Then Levine quit, likely ahead of getting a pink slip. If anything the Brewers are doing him a favor and letting him come aboard a well regarded/successful operation to build/rebuild his name in the game.
  19. Jopal78
    I don’t know if that’s true. I think Golden was deemed by the pundits the “most ready” to play in the NFL : fluid hips, separation, hands etc. And he played at a big time college facing strong opponents each weak. Maybe his size or adaptability to the nuances of the pros is holding him back
  20. Jopal78
    Maybe somebody else said it, but Contreras is likely going to reset the comparable for a catcher in Year 2 or arbitration, so no surprise the Brewers might dig their feet in, and online posts aside Contreras’ agents certainly new this is how it was going to play out, and likely Wild Bill did too. The ol’ “it’s a business” line.
  21. Jopal78
    Look at the trades of Hader, Burnes and Williams each of those players were traded for multiple less experienced players, nearly all of whom plugged directly into the major league roster. Trading Peralta hurts the Brewers chances to defend their division title in 2026, so I’d imagine any trade involving Peralta would involve players plugging directly into the major league roster to fill the talent void and not bench/utility players and minor leaguers.
  22. Jopal78
    I can’t explain the Golden situation, a guy taken in the 1st round who is the 5th or 6th WR. The Packers do have overwhelming confidence in their staff to be able to coach players up and draft amateurs which results in them drafting on future potential than immediate impact (Van Ness or Watson for example). The difference between the Bears and Packers is necessity. When the cupboard is bare, a team needs players to contribute immediately
  23. Jopal78
    Is there anything more subjective than claiming somebody “won a trade“? As bit players in free agency, the last five years or so, trading veterans with expiring team control for less experiencd players with more control, is the Brewers’ methodology to augment their existing talent level. Sometimes the acquired talent works out, others it doesn’t. But when no realistic option exists for the front office to keep Hader, Burnes, Williams etc., it’s kind of hard to “lose” a trade when the objective was to move the veteran with expiring team control. Even with Ruiz for Contreras and Yeager. Even if Contreras had flopped, the objective was to move an OFer where Milwaukee was flush, for a catcher where they did not have a player in the organization with everyday starting talent.
  24. Jopal78
    They have 2 different DTs than those who played against Baltimore. One of the new DTs is Jonathon Ford, a player the Packers already released once, who was just released by Chicago (not regarded as a strong defensive team). The other is Nazir Stackhouse a undrafted rookie they’ve carried on the 53 man all year, but signed muktiple DTs off the street during the season to play in front of. Hence, the terms I used: inexperienced and undermanned. The Bears ran it 40 times in their win over the Eagles. If the Packers DL can’t stop the inside run; I would expect the Bears to run it like that again.
  25. Jopal78
    Given the beat down the Ravens’ OL gave the Packers, allowing Henry and Co. to run wild through the middle; why would the Bears do anything but feed Swift and Monangai right up the middle, force the inexperienced/undermanned Green Bay DL stop them and keep the Packers offense off the field?
×
×
  • Create New...