Yes, I understand how referrals work work. However when players are owed tens of millions of dollars starting 10 years years down the road, teams aren’t putting that money away now it defeats the purpose of deferring it in the first place. Secondly a dollar 10 years or more from now will be worth less. That is why the Bonilla situation is unique he’s been getting interest. Strasburg is the only guy recently that deferred with interest. The point remains teams the traffic heavily and deferrals are tying their hands in their future over how revenue can be redistributed.
No, the owners in ‘94 proposed to share all local revenue, have a salary cap, eliminate arbitration with FA after 4-5 years. The players rejected the proposal and demanded a floor as well. This was primarily due to distrust of owners like Selig who was acting commissioner. I certainly don’t blame the players I’m sure owners like Selig would have screwed them if they agreed to a cap without floor.
However, that was the last real opportunity. Now, while it sounds great to Brewer or Royals fans, such a proposal would never even get to the players to consider because there are probably 20 of the teams who will never agree to share the local revenue. It doesn’t make sense for them to give more horses a shot at the flag simply to narrow their gap with the lead horse.