I mean, I get this sentiment, but the Brewers have been a top-10 team by wins since 2010 (we’re ranked 9th, in fact, a bit better than Houston). By any measure besides pennants (of which we have one, all-time), this is the most successful era in team history. It is not like the organizational approach has been self-evidently incorrect—it has been, in fact, wildly successful. The only small-market teams that have been at or above our level are the Guardians and Rays.
So if someone wants to say we need to do an organizational self-scout and hold those two franchises up against what we’re doing as we look for marginal improvements, then ok, I’m with you. But if we think our problem is that we don’t build our teams like the Dodgers, Yankees, Braves, and Red Sox (and, to be clear, I’m not saying you’re doing this, @Bulldogboy), then we need to stay clear-eyed about what is truly possible. We can’t be bullet-proof everywhere, so the question is, where do we seek compromises? I’ve seen slugging teams that couldn’t buy competent pitching, and recently, we’ve had outstanding run-prevention and anemic offenses. It sucks, but that’s the nature of the beast for us.