There is no reason to think they are unlikely to amount to anything. All three project as plausible major league arms even if they end up being bullpen guys. Lind was pretty much worthless to this team and if he was just released would probably get a one year deal worth about what he is getting payed now. The only argument I can see against this deal is that the team needs a 3B more than pitching but they can find a 3B with other assets. Im sure someone smarter than I would have this answer, but it is a very low percentage of any rookie ball/short season players ever reaching the majors and none of these guys are classified as elite. On a percentage basis, there is every reason to think that none of these guys will ever amount to anything. Its highly likely that Zach Davies has already pitched more major league innings than all three of these guys will ever pitch. I have no problem trading away Lind of course. It was a good thing to do for the future, but these guys are really low level assets. Unfortunately we will never know what the other two serious offers for Lind were. What is clear is that Sterns likes these guys, a lot. He also knows the flame out rate for low level players and thought getting 3 greatly improves the chances of getting a major leaguer out of this deal. I'm not jumping up and down over this, but I'm cautiously optimistic. They could easily be a bunch of Will Inman types, but something in Sterns' metrics said they were legit prospects. For now I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. If nothing else, it looks like a better return for Lind than Oakland got for Lawrie.