wiguy94
-
Posts
6,796 -
Joined
-
Days Won
98
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
News
2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking
Milwaukee Brewers Videos
2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks
The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project
2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by wiguy94
-
-
You said Houser is a nothing burger who is overpaid at $5M and that Taylor can't even get a .300 OBP. You didn't use the word bad but if $5M is too expensive for Houser then you're absolutely saying he's bad.
-
Well how could they have possibly known that? Arnold literally admitted that Crow was on the Brewers Rule 5 short list. Plus if Houser and Taylor are as bad as you say they are then clearly Stearns and company don't think Crow is very good lol.
-
Yeah this trade is fine if we are headed towards a rebuild which it appears to be the case. Still not great value or process to give up 2 solid MLB players for someone a team just left unprotected in the Rule 5 draft 2 weeks ago. Sacrificing roster depth when we have little roster upside if the intention is to contend is bad process, so I hope the rebuild is incoming.
-
I've never mentioned Ryan Brady lol
-
Because you and others have claimed this move was to clear salary and 40 man spots for other moves...?
-
Because he was playing through an elbow injury and clearly wasn't healthy lol
-
Wow. You saw Crow pitch? I stand down. You're clearly the expert on Coleman Crow!
-
Yes the Brewers a team who needs to win in the margins because we carry low payrolls giving up quality depth pieces is something that shouldn't just be brushed off like it's nothing. The big picture is this very likely is a precursor to a sell off and 2024 retool year which will make the trade make sense. People like you acting like this trade is a good trade if the idea is to contend next year are the ones who aren't seeing the big picture.
-
As we so clearly saw in 2023, just writing in rookies as immediate impact players is absolutely a recipe for success. Zero issues.
-
And Crow has a 40 grade FB that tops out at 91 mph right now. He gets great spin and has good breaking balls but if his FB doesn't tick up he has major reliever risk. He's also coming off TJ and won't be available for most if not all of 2024 then will be Rule 5 eligible again and needing to be protected if he's any good.
-
Why could Tyrone not have gotten innings in this OF? He literally carried the Brewers offense in the last 6 weeks of the season. I guess if we are hitting a retool/rebuild year like it appears we are then yeah it makes sense to just go with the young players because results don't matter, but if the idea is to contend then Tyrone offers a higher floor than all of our young OF.
-
Tyrone was in his first year of arbitration not his third. He still has 3 years of team control. Brewers have plenty of players on the 40-man that they could have easily cleared to make room for roster moves. Ethan Small, Clayton Andrews, Vinny Capra, Chris Roller, Jahmai Jones.
-
Implying Houser was overpaid is wild when guys like Lance Lynn, Kyle Gibson, Erick Fedde are getting over $10M guaranteed. Tyrone is a great 4th OF. He's an awesome pinch hitter, a great defender, an average overall hitter, a good baserunner. You're just underrating those two players who combined for nearly 3 fWAR last year despite both having injury issues. 3 fWAR for a project $7M in 2024 is a bargain.
-
I mean why did they need to clear any money? Before this trade we were set to open the year with a 26-man payroll $15M lower than last year and $30M lower than 2022. We also have a ton of money coming off the books after 2024. The idea that the Brewers are in a salary crunch is a fallacy.
-
What would your thoughts be on Burnes + Wiemer/Mitchell for Julien, Festa, and Prielipp.
-
Mets turned half a season of washed Eduardo Escobar into Landon Marceaux, 1 season of Adrian Houser, and 3 seasons of Tyrone Taylor. That's pretty outstanding work from them.
-
I don't think that trade makes sense for the Brewers. Brewers will not be contending if we don't get MLB ready pitching back for Burnes, so getting Polanco a short term piece back in this trade doesn't make any sense.
-
Good joke homer!
-
You're just making yourself look silly because you clearly don't know the rules.
-
You very clearly don't know what you're talking about.
-
I mean I would certainly be annoyed if I was them. They have the money to get guys like these in FA and not pinch pennies.
-
He wouldn't be on the 26 man roster...he would be on the 60 day IL...
-
No you're the one who doesn't understand. Crow had TJ mid August. You're looking at around 12 months rehab and could easily be milked for longer. That will likely push the Rule 5 roster time requirement to 2025. Yes he will need to be on the 26 man for 90 days before being optioned in that scenario but he's going to added to be added to the 40-man next offseason either way. So in regards to 40-man flexibility the only difference between Rule 5 and the trade is him being on the 40-man this offseason. In season he will be on the 60 day-IL which will take him off the 40 man. Next offseason he would have been added either way. Edit: Before you say he won't be added to the 40-man next offseason we literally just added Bradley Blalock to the 40-man this year coming off TJ and never having pitched in AA.
-
You're mixing up 26 man and 40 man flexibility.
