Why would you rather have a 35 year old Pavano for three years than a 30 year old Blanton for only two? Pavano is going to be worse and more expensive. I don't really care if he gives up more home runs if he otherwise pitches well. I think some have very unrealistic expectations of what Melvin can do at this point. Yeah, I'd love Zack Greinke or Matt Garza as much as the next fan, but neither is likely going to happen at this point. Blanton makes a reasonable salary and is fairly good. Certainly he's a strong #4 starter. As long as we don't have to give up much in a trade to get him, I am perplexed at what the real downside is. Edit: Brewers Bar has a pretty good comparison between Pavano and Blantonthat is worth a read.