I have to say I disagree with every single thing you wrote. 1) The schedule is always going to be unbalanced no matter what. Some teams are going to have tougher opponents at the end of the year, while some will have an arguable cake walk. A few more or less games against teams from the other league won't fix this. 2) You could argue that having pitchers attempt to hit is a serious joke, as well. For every Carlos Zambrano there are a dozen Ben Sheets in that batter's box. I think the current system of one league having the DH and one without is fine, though. 3) Ichiro says "konichiwa!" You basically admitted you were wrong and over generalizing on that one, though. 4) I think most of the point of the All-Star game is having all these great players working together on each team, even more so than having the AL and NL against each other, so I really don't feel it takes away from one special game out of the year. The All-Star Game in MLB is clearly the only all star game in major sports that really means anything, so I don't think interleague play has really affected it. I think most people against it are just romanticizing the old days, or like someone else said, pretty much opposed to any of the changes Bud "the devil's hand maiden" Selig have made. My take is, why shouldn't I as someone who lives near an NL team's city have a chance to see guys like Vlad Guerrero and Derek Jeter play in person once in a while, without having to make a plane trip out of state, or hope that my team somehow faces them in the World Series? The whole notion of this divide between the two leagues seems really antiquated, IMHO. It's not like they're two separate entities operating independently of each other, really.