Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Turning2

Verified Member
  • Posts

    431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Turning2

  1. That is sadly all too accurate and perfectly reflects how insultingly ridiculous MLB's economic imbalance is.
  2. I have no doubt that they won't cut bait. Presently, he's cheap enough for a budget challenged team to keep dangling that potential on a stick for a while yet.
  3. Yep, cut bait. Nothing personal against him but if the shoulder can’t hold up again to diving into a base, you can’t use that.
  4. That’s pretty much the long and short of it. Crazy to have a surplus of quality SP and no clear way to get value to address immediate needs.
  5. I agree with virtually every word of that opinion. It's the reason I posted it. Keep seeing people wanting trades, and I just don't see any realistic options that make sense. Just about every possible acquisition isn't enough of an upgrade to justify retarding the development of several prospects unless they're willing to spend that capital. I think we're at where we're going to be for a couple of years until the prospects come up, and people are just going to have to get used to it. Maybe they make a big move in free agency to land at least one real bat, but I'm not sure who might be available offhand.
  6. Thanks. Still new around here. It looks like its in the right forum, but perhaps mods moved it for me. Can't remember where I posted it to.
  7. Around social media, Brewer fans are begging for trades to upgrade 3B and or SS. Problem is, are there any realistic targets? (realistic as in - proven hitters, and within feasible budgetary bounds). And what amount of prospect capital would be an acceptable trade value? All the people hollering for trades never name names and at what cost to the farm system. So, who could reasonably be traded for (including affordability) that actually makes a significant impact/upgrade, and what would you be willing to give up? I realize a lot of that is highly subjective. As I look at 3B stat leaders, nobody really jumps out as a realistic target with nearly guaranteed upgrade / impact qualities.
  8. Clarke had some big flys in spring training a couple years ago if I remember correctly. Got some folks excited.
  9. Well, that's one way for the Cubs to avoid facing Misiorowski for now. Get'em tomorrow. What an absolute garbage late spring / early summer so far.
  10. I'm not a WAR guy. Not a proponent of most, if not all, of the 21 century/Moneyball invented metrics. Far too subjective of a valuation. Any Win Above Replacement would have to factor in the performance of all the other players in the books in those games, and how they performed. It can't just be W vrs L relative to Player A vrs Player(s) B,C which is how I understand it to be. Teams do have to identify guys who can at least produce to a minimum standard at the MLB level, and every team does to varying degrees of success. Perhaps the Brewers are a little better at it than others. But at the end of the day, none of those minimum standards meeting, role / utility / platoon level players are difference makers that decide the team's seasonal fate. Collins, like so many others, is a filler track buried on the 2nd side of an LP from 1975. Solid, complimentary, supplementary, valuable....but not the defining part of the whole. You have to have those guys on your team, but they can't be roughly 1/3 of your everyday lineup which is the case for MIL at the moment.
  11. Well there you have it… the Brewers clearly robbed the White Sox in this deal 😀
  12. Guys like Collins are kind of a dime for a dozen. Not meant as an insult. He’s a valuable role player, and I like him. I just don’t think the Brewers did anything particularly unique in developing him that every other organization doesn’t do with their bench players.
  13. That probably isn't a horse you can reasonably expect to change in midstream. Did he even work out at 3B in spring training this year? I know he did last year, but don't recall hearing anything about that this season. Sal is a gamer though no doubt.
  14. They are not close to being serious contenders for anything more than a wildcard spot and another quick exit. They need at least 3 solid bats. They are not going to trade for that many impact players. They are biding their time, pinning their hopes on a new crop of prospects to all mature simultaneously into being above average players to complement whatever of the current crop is left in a couple years. Any huge trade(s) would block the path of those prospects the front office is banking on too. (Of course, some of them would be in the trade exchange). It is a little disappointing that there doesn't seem to be any feasible short term 3B options that could plug in for a couple of cheap years until Wilken, Pratt, Boeve or whoever comes up.
  15. Frelick at the top has been a good move in my opinion. But if/when Turang gets hot again, he’ll probably go back to leading off.
  16. That's about where I land as well. Just keep it in house. Pretty unorthodox to ask a guy who has never worked in middle relief to do so in the middle of a season. Most likely, Arnold was looking to move him anyway. Didn't have to become a drama thing, AND it put the Brewers in lesser negotiating position which he had to realize. That smacks of ingratitude to some degree or ignorance.
  17. Where do the previous game threads go? Archived somewhere or removed? Was going to read through yesterday ‘s.
  18. Supposedly. Yeah, who knows. Does it really matter at this point? Not sure that it does.
  19. Middle relief pen is largely a second set of starting rotation arms. And Woody coming back soon too.
  20. These two are largely interchangeable and have nearly identical skill sets. Murphy views the 6 spot as a second leadoff as it statistically leads off the second most innings after the 1 spot. So it makes sense to have them hitting with Turang at 1 and Sal at 6. But Frelick has better offensive numbers while Turang is slipping a little. Wouldn't it seem logical to flip them some days and see how it pans out? I wouldn't mind even seeing them in the 1 and 2 since we're getting almost nothing after 6. Yount and Molitor were regularly at the top of the lineup. Turang and Frelick are the closest thing they have currently to that HOF duo of the past. Why not try that recipe and let the power hitters 3-6 get more ABs with men on base?
  21. Yes, they have to be strategic / smart about it.
  22. Let him get a taste. No reason not to. If any of the minor league infielders were ready for 3B, I say get them up for a taste as well. MIL literally has nothing to lose. They are a wildcard at best and even that is bit of a stretch unless the heart of the order start hitting again.
  23. My knee jerk reaction is also "you don't move a gold / platinum glove". But my opinion has changed. There can be circumstances where that becomes a blind spot in how a team can best manage its assets. If you can spend virtually at will to acquire or retain the upper crust talent, then keep your GG's at the position. But for a small market / shoestring budget team, I'm no longer married to that concept. I think it would be less preferable now in the middle of the season to shift Turang to SS, but I wouldn't be opposed to it for next season. MIL is biding its time with what they have until a prospect or three arrive in a couple of years. Nobody of the ballyhooed prospect pool is expected to make the jump next year from what I read. Durbin and Ortiz are band aids unless they start hitting. And I doubt they pick up anyone of significance in the off season for 3rd or SS to alter the current infield options. MIL is stalling until Pratt, Wilken, Adams, Bitonti, Boeve, Made etc are ready and gambling they are MLB quality talents. We have a couple of "meh" seasons to chomp threw most likely.
  24. LOL, nope. I despise MLB's financial / competitive imbalance. Whether or not they get overlooked is entirely subjective, and you may have your opinion. I happen to believe it's in MLB's interests to have its shiniest awards go to its shiniest stars in its big market franchises whenever possible. Of course there will be exceptions. But to your point, I do think sometimes they "throw a bone" to small market teams as a feel good consolation prize like Murphy's Manager of the Year. Really meaningless award, but hey, Brewers fans can thump their chest about something, and that will keep them watching this grossly tilted league. I believe there is an aspect of that in the MLB business model.
  25. Yes, I wrongly interpreted that you meant this season. The rest of your post is on point. He has MVP potential no doubt. Stiff competition though. Has to be lights out obvious as small market players will get overlooked if there are several neck and neck considerations. He'll be an All Star no doubt. Probably multiple times if for no other reason than he will be the marketing face of the franchise for most of the coming decade.
×
×
  • Create New...