I think this is all fair, and I tend to agree with your last sentence. It seems like this signing is a precursor to something else, and if it is, it's a pretty big something else, just IMO. But, the alternative is that they're fine with the flexibility/versatility that they have as indicated in your comments as well. It really seems like it has to be one or the other- they're focused on building a super flexible IF/lineup using lots of players who can play a bunch of places, or they're going to move a some of the current pieces to give us clarity. Probably nothing in the middle of those two options.