This seems like a silly argument against replay. Say the Brewers have bases loaded and hit one down the line that is called foul. Upon review, the call is reversed to a fair ball. The batter is awarded 2B and all runners advance two bases. For argument's sake, lets say that Gomez was on first and would have scored easily if the call was correct originally. Which would you rather have: 1) No replay available, so foul ball stands, or 2) Replay overturns call and Brewers get two runs and have runners on second and third? Obviously, scenario two, while not perfect, results in a situation that is much closer to what should have happened. Awarding bases won't be perfect, but they can easily tell within one base of what would have happened.