That's not a very fair response to Kaukana's post, most of which was chock full of "I hope I'm wrong", "I'm sure the sources are strong", and "I might just be getting antsy". The tone of "this site was wrong once before" was a little strange, but the context of the entire post was a lot more than just J. Weeks blunder = site not to be trusted. Now, on to naivin's suggestion about Eckstein. Let the battle begin!