I t's very simple. I don't want to use OPS because it's not a very good measure of run production. The fact that it was included in the projections I posted was not some kind of endorsement for it. People expect to see it, so I put it there. I think BA is pretty worthless as well but I included it. Does that mean I want to use that instead? You didn't make the claim that those 3 pitchers will outslug or out OPS Kendall, you said they were better hitters at this point. To me, the better hitter will result in their team scoring more runs. A batter with the same OPS but a higher OBP will produce more runs for his team. If I were you, I would want to use OPS as well. It at least gives tou a fighting chance. Like I said, 1.8 x OBP + SLG most closely matches the linear weights value, which why I suggested it. Some people have used a number as low as 1.5, which would be fine as well. Anyone who suggests I want to use a mutiplier simply because it benefits me probably has no idea where that equation comes from, so I'm not going to argue about it. And I have no problem simply using linear weight values that correctly gives less value for an IBB and docks a batter for hitting into double plays. Those are excellent points and hould be accounted for. I'm not going to handicap myself simply for the sake of getting the bet agreed on, though. But sure, this has probably become more complicated than most people would want it to be but tryng to measure offensive production isn't simple. That's probably why you see people constantly arguing about who's the better of two hitters. It usually doesn't involve a positional player and a trio of pitchers, however. Fatter said 3 pitchers are better hitters than Kendall. I disagree but if we can't agree on what makes someone a better hitter, this is a waste of time.