If the Bucks didn't sign Redd to a max contract, someone else would have (or come darned close to), and they would have lost him for nothing. So? You don't sign players like Redd to max contracts unless you have a player like Dwight Howard or Dwyane Wade or Chris Paul. Trying to build around Redd as your best player leads you exactly where the Bucks have been since he signed that contract. Bad with a chance to be mediocre if everything goes right. but that would mean being the worst team in the league or darned close to in order to get the #1 overall pick. Since we signed Redd to that extension, we've averaged 32 wins. The teams who have gotten the #1 pick since Redd signed his extension have averaged 28 wins. So no, you don't have to be the worst team in the league to get the #1 pick and we've been one of the worst teams in the league since Redd signed that contract. And when his contract is up he will get a lot more than $6M. But will he get a max contract like Redd got? Please compare Redd to another player who was a star prior to his contract coming up. I'm not going to compare him to stars, because Redd is not a star. Joe Johnson signed a 5 year $70 million contract, he's better than Redd. Kevin Martin signed a 5 year $55 million contract, Josh Howard signed a 4 year $40 million contract, Rip Hamilton signed a 3 year $34 million extension, Stephen Jackson signed a 4 year $35 million extension, Danny Granger signed a 5 year $60 million contract. Those players are all comparable to or better than Redd and signed for much less. Either way, contracts aren't going to matter until the Bucks start drafting better. That's why they need to fire Dave Babcock. He's been on the job for four years I believe and he's gotten us Bogut, Yi and Alexander in the lottery. That's awful.