Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
5 minutes ago, nate82 said:

Who says no?  Assuming there are no NTC involved and money isn’t an issue.  
 

Brewers: Tucker

Dodgers: Yelich

I’m not sure the Brewers accept and I think the Dodgers are a maybe.  

Pretty easily Tucker for the fact that he’s younger and has a better chance to rebound as well as the fact that he can actually play a position so you aren’t just clogging the DH spot every day.

The Dodgers would never swap the two to get Yelich. Maybe the Brewers wouldn’t swap either but only because of optics. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, nate82 said:

Who says no?  Assuming there are no NTC involved and money isn’t an issue.  
 

Brewers: Tucker

Dodgers: Yelich

I’m not sure the Brewers accept and I think the Dodgers are a maybe.  

No way. Tucker is not good.

Posted
Just now, adambr2 said:

Way to give Skubal the nice quick inning that he needed, guys. 

Was a horrible AB by Vaughn.  Sanchez had two very hittable pitches.  Vaughn should have let the 2-1 pitch go.  Yes that gets you to 2-2 but there was nothing he was going to be able to do with that pitch.

Posted
Just now, baseball101 said:

Yes however taking that contract on makes it close. 

He said if money is not a factor though in the original question. 

Posted

So apparently Orenelas is here because he used to play against Murphy’s kid. 

I mean he only replaced Bae so I don’t really care, but there you go. 

Posted

Sanchez just because you framed it there doesn’t mean it was thrown there. Come on, man. Reckless given the situation and not even close. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Need to come up with high leverage and low leverage challenge system so we don't waste a challenge on a 1-0 to 2-0 pitch with no one on base and two outs in the 4th inning.  Especially when the pitch misses by over 2 ******* inches.

Posted
9 minutes ago, edfunderburk said:

Glad we didn’t include Henderson in a trade for Skubal

You’re not wrong but I felt a run coming from the Dodgers this inning the second I saw this post. 

Verified Member
Posted
Just now, yourout said:

Now that was a fat changeup.

Henderson knew it right when he threw it 

Posted

The amount of anger most here show about bad challenges here is really something. Are they bad? A lot of times yes, but you all get back to me when it has been proven that a challenge has cost them a game. 

Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

You’re not wrong but I felt a run coming from the Dodgers this inning the second I saw this post. 

I’m still glad Henderson will be [could remain] in Milwaukee for the next five years 

Posted
1 minute ago, ImissDougMelvin said:

The amount of anger most here show about bad challenges here is really something. Are they bad? A lot of times yes, but you all get back to me when it has been proven that a challenge has cost them a game. 

You’ve got the market cornered on raging about our lack of home runs so the rest of us have to pick a different category. 

  • WHOA SOLVDD 1
Posted
Just now, adambr2 said:

You’ve got the market cornered on raging about our lack of home runs so the rest of us have to pick a different category. 

Lack of homeruns are a proven factor that they can be/have been always will be a factor in games, for every single team. No challenge has ever cost the Brewers a game. Lack of HR's have. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...