Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Brewers News & Analysis

    Could Garrett Mitchell Be the Odd Man Out in the Outfield?


    Jack Stern

    PECOTA has a harsh 2024 projection for Garrett Mitchell. What is it seeing, and could it point toward Mitchell ceding playing time in a crowded outfield?

    Image courtesy of © Michael McLoone-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

    Baseball Prospectus’s PECOTA projections have been out for several weeks. Among the most notable Brewers forecasts is the one for Garrett Mitchell.

    The former first-rounder has started his big-league career by slashing a solid .278/.343/.452 (119 wRC+), albeit in just 141 plate appearances. PECOTA’s expectations are bearish: a .207/.284/.333 and 72 DRC+ (Deserved Runs Created Plus, BP's all-encompassing offensive measurement, which is scaled to 100 and in which higher is better).

    It’s easy to be disdainful of that forecast. Mitchell has produced above-average offense at every stop of his professional career, so how did the model come up with such ugly numbers?

    The answer is that PECOTA doesn’t care about Mitchell’s box score results. Whereas stats like OPS and wRC+ are derived from plate appearance outcomes, Baseball Prospectus’s line of projections and metrics strips things back to what a hitter shows on a per-pitch basis. That’s where things get hairy for Mitchell.

    No one is questioning Mitchell’s athleticism. His average sprint speed of nearly 30 feet per second makes him one of the fastest runners in baseball. He’s an excellent defensive center fielder, with ample strength in his 6-foot-3 frame.

    Mitchell’s process at the plate has also looked promising. He’s made mostly wise swing decisions as a big leaguer, posting a lower-than-average chase rate and an average swing rate on pitches in the zone. As someone who can make hard contact, Mitchell has attacked inside pitches most aggressively in a justified effort to pull the ball.

    mitchell swing rate.png

    What causes concern is Mitchell’s swing path. Scouts have long worried that it leaves him vulnerable to velocity up in the strike zone and prevents him from elevating the ball on contact.

    Mitchell has done little to ease those doubts. Buried beneath his solid slash lines are high strikeout and ground ball rates. Mitchell punched out at a 25.5% clip in his minor-league career, while hitting 61.8% of his batted balls on the ground.

    His big-league showing has been even more alarming on a per-swing basis, creating more red flags for a projection system like PECOTA.

    Mitchell has whiffed on 33.5% of his swings against fastballs. Most of those whiffs come on elevated heaters, where Mitchell’s contact rate drops significantly. Notice the shift once he sees a fastball above the belt.

    mitchell contact rate fastballs.png

    It’s not hard to find productive hitters with high strikeout rates in the modern game, but not all strikeout-heavy bats are equal. Driving the ball and doing damage is a common overarching goal at the plate. For some, strikeouts are an accepted side effect of such an approach. For others, the swing-and-miss reaches an unintentionally extreme level and prevents them from doing damage.

    Mitchell falls into the latter camp. While his whiff rates have been high across all pitch groups, his inability to make contact with fastballs is especially troublesome for his outlook. Only one qualified hitter (MJ Melendez) whiffed on fastballs in 2023 as frequently as Mitchell has in the majors.

    Mitchell has looked better on the quality of contact front since reaching the majors, posting a 40.5% ground-ball rate and 28.7% line-drive rate. Statcast says he’s found the “sweet spot” of the bat (producing launch angles between 8 and 32 degrees) on 40.5% of batted balls.

    Still, that’s not enough to sustainably compensate for Mitchell’s lack of consistent contact. He’s been incredibly fortunate on balls in play, enjoying a .441 BABIP and .537 wOBA on contact. Even hitters with a world-class ability to “guide the ball” (think Luis Arráez) cannot maintain such a success rate on batted balls, let alone one like Mitchell, who has not demonstrated plus bat control.

    Based on his quantity and quality of contact, Statcast assigned Mitchell an expected .207/.279/.342 line and .276 xwOBA for his big-league work to date. Baseball Prospectus thinks he deserved a .197/.277/.326 slash and 64 DRC+. His 2024 projection is similar.

    Without improvements to his swing, Mitchell is at risk of ceding playing time in a Brewers outfield filled with young talent. Given that depth, Mitchell’s full set of minor-league options, and his need for more development, there isn’t much pressure to roster him. While a demotion back to Triple-A might surprise some fans, it could be a plausible possibility in the near future.

    Research assistance provided by TruMedia.

    Follow Brewer Fanatic For Milwaukee Brewers News & Analysis

    • Like 1

    Recent Brewers Articles

    Recent Brewers Videos

    Brewers Top Prospects

    Brandon Sproat

    Milwaukee Brewers - MLB, RHP
    Sproat had a rough first appearance in a Brewers uniform (3 IP, 7 ER, 3 HR). On Thursday, he gave up one run on 4 hits and a walk over 6 2/3 innings. He struck out six Blue Jays batters.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    It probably is a bit early to tell. My guess is that LF=Yeli CF=Chourio RF= Sal 4th=Mitchell. Early on Bauers is the 4th OF when Yeli DH's and Weimer and Perkins start in AAA. Chourio could easily swap with Weimer in AAA to start the year but like I said it is a bit early on in spring training to see where the bats are at.

    Would actually like him in AAA to start the year, one so he can play every day after missing pretty much all of last year. Secondly, want to see if he can stay healthy playing every day. Certainly think he is behind Frelick in the OF depth chart, not buying Frelick to 3B. Might make sense to even keep Wiemer over Mitchell against LHP. Even with that all said Mitchell no doubt still has the potential to break out so would rather see a guy like Perkins riding the pine getting inconsistent playing time versus Mitchell.

    Been listening to the naysayers regarding Mitchell since the day he was drafted. Since then, all he's done is hit.

    He knows he needs to address the hole in his swing on high fastballs. But like everyone else but stat geeks, his positives far outweigh his vulnerabilities..

    .207 predicted average? Sounds like the same type of genius that put Adames batting third with his 165 Ks and no contact.

    Preferring Wiemer to Mitchell?

    I like Wiemer more than Perkins, but he needs to show regular contact before I see him as more than a defensive replacement and a useful guy against left handers.

    Both Mitchell and Frelick are healed and I hope Mitchell gets regular time in left field in late innings..  Yeli still covers ground well, but Mitchells arm is better and he's quick.. A lot depends on Chourio and if he's ready. 

     

    11 minutes ago, Bratwithspecialsauce said:

    Been listening to the naysayers regarding Mitchell since the day he was drafted. Since then, all he's done is hit.

    He knows he needs to address the hole in his swing on high fastballs. But like everyone else but stat geeks, his positives far outweigh his vulnerabilities..

    .207 predicted average? Sounds like the same type of genius that put Adames batting third with his 165 Ks and no contact.

    Preferring Wiemer to Mitchell?

    I like Wiemer more than Perkins, but he needs to show regular contact before I see him as more than a defensive replacement and a useful guy against left handers.

    Both Mitchell and Frelick are healed and I hope Mitchell gets regular time in left field in late innings..  Yeli still covers ground well, but Mitchells arm is better and he's quick.. A lot depends on Chourio and if he's ready. 

     

    "but he needs to show regular contact" 
    You do realize that Mitchell had higher whiff rate than Wiemer right...right?

    • Like 3

    It seems a bit unfair to ding a guy so severely for what should perhaps happen rather than what does happen. I mean, Mitchell has certainly never been as lost as Joey was for much of last year. Well, Mitchell was lost for much of the year...but I digress.

    That said, the team certainly will pay attention to these metrics this spring, and if his performance seems to be following this pattern then by all means work with him at AAA. If his actual numbers look similar to his career MLB numbers, work with him at the major league level. 

     

    • Like 1
    23 minutes ago, Bratwithspecialsauce said:

    Preferring Wiemer to Mitchell?

    I like Wiemer more than Perkins, but he needs to show regular contact before I see him as more than a defensive replacement and a useful guy against left handers.

    The "Wiemer needs to make more contact" thing while arguing in favor of Mitchell is something I have seen a lot of, and I just don't get it.  In MLB, Mitchell's K% is 38.3%. Wiemer is at 28.3%. Mitchell's whiff rate is 35.4%. Wiemer's whiff rate is 33.6%.

    Both have issues with swing and miss, but Wiemer has had fewer than Mitchell. It's ok to talk about the struggles of Wiemer, but I don't see how it can be flipped into a positive for Mitchell at the same time.

    Frankly, I think we were very much on the precipice of a Mitchell collapse right before his injury last year, and there would likely be a much different view of him amongst the fanbase if he had played more.

    All that said... We don't know that he would have collapsed for sure, and I do think his results will usually be better than his expected stats, due to the speed and hustle that will turn grounders into singles and singles into doubles. He has also made some swing adjustments this offseason, like Wiemer. We will see if that helps him cover the top of the zone fastballs any better.

    TLDR; both Wiemer and Mitchell have plenty of concerns, but using Wiemer's swing and miss concerns as a pro-Mitchell argument doesn't make much sense.

    • Like 4

    It’s not naysaying Mitchell to point out that his 119 wRC+ over 141 MLB PAs is very likely unsustainable with a 38.3 K% and .441 BABIP under the hood. It’s just math.

    A .350 BABIP is pretty much the ceiling over any meaningful sample. Among 226 batters with at least 1,000 PA since 2021 only Brandon Marsh (.384), JD Davis (.351) and Freeman (,.351) have cleared that bar. Hit King Luis Arraez is at .340.

    Objective one is just stay healthy. Of course a guy’s performance will be volatile with only 187 games and 732 PAs spread out across five levels and three years.

    After that the K rate needs to come down at least a dozen points.

    If both of those things happen, we should be in business.

    • Like 4
    Joseph Zarr
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    42 minutes ago, Smichaelis9 said:

    The "Wiemer needs to make more contact" thing while arguing in favor of Mitchell is something I have seen a lot of, and I just don't get it.  In MLB, Mitchell's K% is 38.3%. Wiemer is at 28.3%. Mitchell's whiff rate is 35.4%. Wiemer's whiff rate is 33.6%.

    Lotttttta people in a lotttttta places are prejudicial toward mullets. You toss in a curly wavy dirty blonde mullet? People are storming the clubhouse and demanding a return to Triple-A. Is this unconscious behavior? A hidden agenda? I can't tell you the truth. And, even if I did, I'd have to do so knowing I am putting my neck on the line.

    looking i see you GIF by Birch Coffee

    • WHOA SOLVDD 1

    Nothing against Wiemer, but I'll take Mitchells .100 higher average and what looks to be an improved whiff rate this spring.

    People with short memories forget how hot we were before he had his freak accident. HE was the energy this team had last April.  Wiemer was not supposed to be in the majors last season, but Frelick and Mitchell going down opened a door for him... and after a hot start, pitchers adapted and he still hasn't been able do much, except against left handers..

    Mitchell is a far more rounded player at this point.

    1 hour ago, Bratwithspecialsauce said:

    Nothing against Wiemer, but I'll take Mitchells .100 higher average and what looks to be an improved whiff rate this spring.

    People with short memories forget how hot we were before he had his freak accident. HE was the energy this team had last April.  Wiemer was not supposed to be in the majors last season, but Frelick and Mitchell going down opened a door for him... and after a hot start, pitchers adapted and he still hasn't been able do much, except against left handers..

    Mitchell is a far more rounded player at this point.

    Mitchell’s average comes in a super small sample size with him dramatically overperforming his peripherals. Also Wiemer was called up before Frelick and Mitchell wasn’t injured so don’t know how you can say Frelick and Mitchell going down opened the door for him. 

    Mitchell was a no. 1 draft pick and has hit .278 with 5 HR in 128 AB. That's a small sample size, but I guess super small is subjective. It does expand to 25 HR AND 80 RBI over a season.. I think he's made a career out of proving the naysayers wrong on a regular basis his whole life. By the way, those stats would have led the team in HR and tied Adames for the RBI lead..He's not an HR hitter per se, but he's working hard at making himself more of a power threat during his time off.

    He also has stolen 9 bases and only caught once.

    Your search for negative things to say about him, using geek stats that claim he has flawed peripherals, is a weak attempt to discredit his results. Meanwhile, you prefer Wiemer?

    Wiemer might become a hitter one day (and he has had success against left handers while playing solid defense, so he has value).

    If you recall, Frelick got hurt about the same time as Mitchell, or he would have gotten the call when Mitchell went down. Wiemer would have filled Perkins role at best.

    Mitchell needs to improve his upper strike zone coverage, which I expect he will do.

    Bottom line, this team plays better when Mitchell is in the lineup. He hits, can bunt, can run, is a good fielder and has a great attitude and approach.

    I'll take a .343 OBP that can steal, hit with some pop and plays great defense any day.

    He wasn't drafted #1 for no reason.

     

     

    • Like 1


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...