Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Top 50 Fits for the Brewers in MLB Free Agency: Nos. 5-1


    Matthew Trueblood

    At long last, we've reached the top of the mountain. These are the five players whom I believe the Brewers would be wisest to pursue and sign this winter, based on team needs, realistic price tags, and the payroll outlook for the team.

    Image courtesy of © Jonathan Dyer-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

    We've already broken down the talents and the fit for 45 MLB free agents. If you've missed all of those, feel free to go back and check them out, and to weigh in on the placement of any of them.

    Nos. 41-50
    Nos. 31-40
    Nos. 21-30
    Nos. 11-20
    Nos. 6-10

    Now, let's turn our attention to the biggest fish in the sea.

    5. Eduardo Rodríguez, LHP
    After opting out of the final three years of what was a five-year agreement with the Tigers, Rodríguez hits the market looking for a fourth or even fifth year, again. If the bidding goes much beyond what he got from Detroit in the first place ($77 million over those five seasons), he might be out of the Brewers' price range. I don't expect that. If anything, I can imagine Rodríguez coming in slightly below that last deal, and at that level, he'd be an excellent piece for the middle of the rotation.

    Rodríguez has a deep arsenal, and it works in some unexpected ways. He can attack both sides of the plate with a cutter that sets up pretty much everything else he throws. He has a sinker that he likes to steer inside on right-handed hitters and away from lefties, which is the opposite of the way most pitchers use that offering. While his strikeout stuff is more good than great, and while his command fluctuates (just as every pitcher's does), Rodríguez is a solid starter who can work deep into games. There's also a good chance that Chris Hook would help Rodríguez put together some of the pieces that haven't quite coalesced into a top-of-the-rotation whole since 2019.

    4. Marcus Stroman, RHP
    The second half of the season got away from Stroman. He suffered a hip injury, tried to pitch through it, and seemingly aggravated it while on the injured list. Before July, though, he was on track to compete for the Cy Young Award. Stroman's success is even more dependent on command than is that of Rodríguez; he doesn't have great velocity or a single pitch that dominates opposing hitters. Often, though, he's able to pinpoint his sinker so well that it sets hitters up for everything else, and he induces a series of weak ground balls. 

    Tinkering is a bit of a problem for Stroman. His self-confidence is so complete that he sometimes lets the perfect become the enemy of the good, chasing the tweak that will make him fully and lastingly unhittable rather than embracing a simpler, more repeatable approach to opposing lineups. Still, when he's healthy, he's a solid second option in any rotation, and he and Freddy Peralta would grow and learn together well.

    3. Seth Lugo, RHP
    Moving from the bullpen to the rotation is much less common than the opposite conversion, but Lugo managed it deftly in 2023. He's always sported an impressive combination of high-spin fastballs and curves, but he finally found an adjustment to his changeup that made it more consistently effective. With an overhand arm slot, Lugo has always had the opportunity to build an offspeed pitch that works vertically, rather than fading to the arm side, but he'd never tapped into that potential until this past season.

    Lugo is less of a brand name than Stroman or Rodríguez, but he's almost equally good, and his price tag figures to be much lower. This is the kind of move that would sneakily move the Brewers forward, by giving them depth and a bridge to the pitching prospects they hope are the future of the organization. Lugo could help them compete in the short term, and getting good value from him could ensure that the team remains competitive in the long term.

    2. Rhys Hoskins, 1B/DH
    With Brandon Woodruff hurt and no longer a part of the organization, starting pitching is an area of need for the Crew. Hence the names above. Their more urgent and major need, though, is for help at the infield corners, and Hoskins is the ideal fit for one half of that. Coming off a season lost to a torn ACL, the erstwhile Phillies slugger not only seems not to have a place in the lineup with his long-time team, but didn't get a qualifying offer from them on the way out the door. That's because they knew he would take it, and they prefer to play Bryce Harper at first base in 2024.

    Now that Hoskins is on the market, though, it's not quite as clear that he's looking for a one-year deal as some might assume. Sure, he would be able to rebuild his value after the injury took away what he hoped would be his platform season, but he would also subject himself to the qualifying offer next winter, since he didn't receive this one. Instead of doing that, he could be open to something more like the deal Michael Conforto signed with the Giants last winter: two years, with the player having a right to opt out after the first one. 

    Hoskins has tremendous power, and his patient approach yields a consistently strong on-base percentage. The injury makes it hard to project him, because hitters do need their lower half to generate the drive on which big power depends. His defense might also not be everything it was before he got hurt. Still, he's solidly above-average at the plate, with 30 home runs as the baseline of his profile. He'd be an excellent cleanup hitter.

    1. Matt Chapman, 3B
    If you think Hoskins is unpredictable in the batter's box, get a load of Chapman. He had a 1.152 OPS in April, and it looked like he was on track for a $200-million contract. From May 1 on, though, he batted .205/.298/.361--production the Brewers could get from Brian Anderson, if they could just wipe his memory of 2023 and get a fresh start with him. In 2018 and 2019, he was well above average, but since then, he's been essentially average. He flashes very good power, and he's not without a hit tool or some plate discipline, but the puzzle pieces haven't fit together over a full season in quite some time.

    The saving grace with Chapman, and the reason why he's still a premium free agent after five months of offensive struggles, is his defense. If he's not the best defender at the hot corner in MLB, he's in the top three. He'll turn 31 next spring, but third basemen often age well with the glove. Last season, the Brewers' success depended greatly on their defense, which was one of the best in baseball. Adding Chapman to the infield phalanx would lock in that team strength for the longer term.

    In franchise history, the only megadeals the Brewers have signed have been with guys who were already members of the organization, like Christian Yelich and Ryan Braun. Chapman's value took a hit when he slumped at the plate for such a long time, but he could still earn a nine-figure deal. That's the big hurdle here. If the Brewers want to lock in an important piece of the batting order and the infield defense for the long term, though, they'll have to go a bit outside their comfort zone. Chapman is the sweet spot, and the Brewers should stay engaged until he signs.

    That's the end of this long countdown. Let's discuss it. Who's too low on the list? Who's too high? Very soon, we'll start to see guys like this sign, and find out whether the Brewers agree with this rough relative valuation or not.

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    23 minutes ago, Michael Trzinski said:

    If you sign Chapman, what becomes of Tyler Black? 

    utility guy? He can play 1B and 3B and has played 2B and OF in the minors.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I worry about Chapman, great glove but he was crap after the 1st month or so. If I am a smaller budget team and I am going to give someone 6/150 (rumors of what he will get) they should be a proven middle of the order bat. Chapman is a .240 hitter who strikes out a ton and hasnt had an ops over .800 since 2020. 

    Honestly after the past week, Woody on a decent 2 year deal (5/18 with incentives) might be my #1. I want my Woody back please.

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There are 226 players with at least 1,000 PAs from 2021-23. Here's how Chapman stacks up...

    1,824 PA (36th) | 110 wRC+ (93rd) | 11.7 WAR (30th)

    Very much a 3TO guy with a 139 BB%+ (24th) | 129 K%+ (213th) | 121 ISO+ (69th) | 133 FB%+ (5th) to go along with a 92 AVG+ (205th).  

    Of course his big feature is his glove with +24 DRS (5th) +15.7 UZR (4th) and +21 OAA (5th) over that stretch, while he's also added sneaky value on the bases at +7.4 BSR (52nd).

    6/150 MLBTR is projecting seems high, 5/120 FanGraphs is closer but still seems like a lot to pay for a guy who should probably hit 6th/7th in a good lineup.

    Steamer projects a 103 wRC+ and 2.6 WAR for 2024, which is maybe like 9 WAR over five years with standard aging curve. Anything over $100M feels likely to be an overpay. 

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, homer said:

    utility guy? He can play 1B and 3B and has played 2B and OF in the minors.

    True, but if Chapman (31) signs, it will most likely be a 3-4 year contract. See where I'm going with this? I'd say if they signed Turner (39) or Longoria (38) to a one-year contract, that would ideal for the growth of Black. If he has to be a 'part-timer' for 3-4 years, it might (or might not) be a bad thing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, sveumrules said:

    There are 226 players with at least 1,000 PAs from 2021-23. Here's how Chapman stacks up...

    1,824 PA (36th) | 110 wRC+ (93rd) | 11.7 WAR (30th)

    Very much a 3TO guy with a 139 BB%+ (24th) | 129 K%+ (213th) | 121 ISO+ (69th) | 133 FB%+ (5th) to go along with a 92 AVG+ (205th).  

    Of course his big feature is his glove with +24 DRS (5th) +15.7 UZR (4th) and +21 OAA (5th) over that stretch, while he's also added sneaky value on the bases at +7.4 BSR (52nd).

    6/150 MLBTR is projecting seems high, 5/120 FanGraphs is closer but still seems like a lot to pay for a guy who should probably hit 6th/7th in a good lineup.

    Steamer projects a 103 wRC+ and 2.6 WAR for 2024, which is maybe like 9 WAR over five years with standard aging curve. Anything over $100M feels likely to be an overpay. 

     

    I agree that 6/150 feels high. 5/120 feels much more manageable, and if it creeps down even from there (toward, say, 5/110), that's what I'm dreaming on by ranking him at the top. He's the kind of high-upside move I want to see them take a chance on, but there's a real risk that the price tag gets crazy. We'll see how the other top names shake out. I'm hoping a few of his would-be suitors get the even bigger fish they're chasing (the Jays land Yamamoto, for instance) and the money dries up a little.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, Michael Trzinski said:

    If you sign Chapman, what becomes of Tyler Black? 

    First base. I don't think he's a third baseman anyway. I like Black, but more as someone like Spencer Steer or Jake Cronenworth than as either a true defensive stud or a star so valuable that you eschew chances to sign proven stars in deference to them. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Black has played a bunch of defensive positions mainly to keep his bat in the lineup  - i wouldn't want him to be a utility guy they give a bunch of gloves to, none of which he use very well in the field - I think he's their 3rd basemen at some point next season and they likely will open with Monasterio over there instead of signing a great defender/streaky at best hitter to play 3rd for $20M+ per season.

    Another intriguing option would be if the Brewers choose not to sign a quality veteran DH, give Black that role instead.

    Of this top 5 list, only Lugo interests me, because I think the rest are going to command too large a contract or carry some injury risk that likely should disqualify them for the Brewers 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm pretty wary of Chapman. He's a good player but with so much of his value tied to defense, I don't think I'm eager to offer him a deal into his mid-30s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm all for adding good players, which Chapman is. However, don't see any way the Brewers compete against the big market teams for his services. If going this route would rather they extend Adames for his age 28-32 seasons.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...