ok, i guess i'm summoning the opinions of my fellow bf.netters out there. i have an interesting dilemma to figure out by Friday morning. it's a good-good dilemma. after many months of searching, today i got offered two separate jobs, and i'm trying to quickly figure out which one would be best for me. 1. Park Ranger job--ideally i would like to become a National Park Ranger (or some non-teaching type of parks and recreation job). and no job better prepares you for being a Park Ranger than being a Park Ranger, right? of the two jobs, this job pays better, not even including the usual health/dental benefits. resume-wise, this is very clearly the better of the two jobs. the downside to this position that i keep thinking about is that it is in Southern Texas. being from Wisconsin, there is a substantial fear that i will even be able to make it through the summers, as they are 105+ degrees with high humidity for most of the year. i should add that this job is 80% outdoors. the location is somewhat near Corpus Christi, but is in an otherwise lifeless and empty town. i don't plan on staying there for that long, maybe one or two years until that good experience gets me a better job somewhere not in Texas. 2. Canopy Guide--this involves mostly ziplines and rappelling, some environmental education, leading tourists through the woods. it starts with a week of unpaid training that has a 15% failure rate, though i've been assured from a friend who manages there that i'll be fine. pay is less with no benefits. the company is young and growing. my friend was a tour guide last year and is a manager this year. the job, however, finishes the end of November and doesn't start again until about March, so i figure to be on unemployment or working at REI between then. certainly not the better of the two jobs on paper, but still somewhat applicable when it comes to a career as a Park Ranger or something similar where i'd be working as something of a tour guide and naturalist educator. Nice thing about this position is that it is located in Asheville, NC, which i consider to be quite possibly the best city in the US. now, despite being told otherwise by my Advisory Board (who happen to share my last name), i still lean somewhat to the Zipline Guide. One reason is that i don't know a soul in Southern Texas, but I have five good friends in Asheville. For whatever reason I see Southern Texas as being a very lonely existence for those one or two years. I think a lot of me leans toward Asheville is that even though the job is worse, i suffer with loneliness quite a bit and it's a value to me to have friends in Asheville. and as a 33-year-old single person, i have no problems admitting that i regularly pray to finally meet a girl and get to settle down, which i guess i don't really see happening in Southern Texas. maybe i won't meet a girl i Asheville, but at 33, maybe i don't have all that many years left for the chance to have a family. yet long-term, i can't deny that the Park Ranger job in Southern Texas almost certainly gets me to my career goal faster than being basically a tour guide. the Zipline Guide training starts on Monday morning, and i have a 20-hour drive ahead of me, not including rests. it would definitely be a quick pack and go (capable of it, even though i work tomorrow). it feels like this is a decision of logic vs. emotions, or even of short-term happiness vs. long-term gains. i've thrown out this dilemma to a good number of friends today and they pretty much had the same answer, but you all have always been so helpful to me in the past, and i was hoping that maybe you all might have something to add on it. if i take the Zipline job, i figure i'll have to leave on Friday night, so i also don't have a ton of time to be debating this whole thing.