define 'superior' and 'inferior' player, though. a team could save up money to spend extra on a superstar but still wind up with Soriano or Pavano. maybe the players have the power, but the owners haven't exactly banded together to try and do anything about it. the current system is perfect for most of them, too. either you can spend money and compete or field a garbage team and collect $20M in revenue sharing. if you threw me $20M per year i could care less if people complained that my team wasn't competitive. and now, the Yankees (and their type) will win the WS, but Selig still gets to say "see, the Devil Rays made it, so every small-spender can do the same!" nothing is going to change until a problem reaches the level of extreme, but with revenue sharing (or MLB loaning you money) no owner has to lose money long-term. so why change the system? this is why i'm rooting for the Yankees to win 10 World Series' in a row (provided the Brewers don't get there). then the fans and even the players will finally get fed up of playing in a corrupt system and demand some changes. what's sad is that if any change in the system were to be made, the bottom-level players would most likely all get a big bump in pay. for all they have to deal with, just making one season of the Major Leagues deserves a heck of a lot more money than $350,000.