I don't think it will look particularly silly. My original post (OP) in the thread clearly indicates Counsell is a solid manager and I don't want any other person managing the team. I think a majority of the posts have indicated the same thing. That does not absolve him from being critiqued. The critique I referenced in the OP really indicates that Counsell has fallen more into a traditional manager (Williams 8th, Hader 9th inning guys) than the innovator he was at the beginning of his tenure and a lack of answers for a stagnant offense. Sure some of it can be chalked up to rule changes like the 3 batter minimum, but 3 hot games of hitting does not cure all ails. Now, if the Crew continues to hit the way it has over the past 3 games (which I hope it does), I will gladly eat crow related to Counsell, Haines and Cruz. Similar to the crow most of us have eaten in the past two years regarding Chris Hook. Keep in mind, no one was advocating for Counsell to be fired, only that he shoulder some of the blame related to the Brewers not hitting. Let's see Hiura, JBJ, Urias, and Cain get their averages above the Mendoza line before we declare the Brewers hitting issues have been solved. I would still like for Counsell to be more the innovator he was in 2017-2019 timeframe, but I understand the changing of the rules of the game may limit that innovation a bit. I don't blame a manager for how hitters hit. Ok, maybe .001% responsible. Cain is 35 and missed all of last year. Hiura struck out a ton in the minors, and some of feared he was no guaranteed hit machine. To be fair, I don't give CC credit for Shaw or Narvaez either. Innovation. Well, much of that comes from analytics/ Stearns. They may finally have the luxury to go the traditional approach. Starters generally going 6, couple options for the 7th with a lead, 8th inning guy, closer. Just because that's traditional doesn't mean it's not the best approach with this staff.