It absolutely is, in the case where one player isn't much "better"/more valuable/more minutes/etc. than the other, according to sources very close to the program. If your teammate, and someone who got the same amount of minutes as you, suddenly got 5x what you were getting, how would you feel and what would you do?
That's because Crowl has integrity, as does Gard and UW. He doesn't have one foot out the door because the system they have in place has been relatively fair and it is what he has been told it would be. When the system becomes different from what he has been told would be the case, that creates cognitive dissonance and will change things.
There is a story about Nigel Hayes and a time when he was with a bunch of other CBB players from other schools. Someone asked the group to raise their hand if what they were told during recruitment was what they experienced in reality. Hayes was the only person who raised his hand. That's how UW chooses to operate.
Isaac Lindsey had his scholarship revoked at UNLV because they brought in what Otzelberger thought was better players. When UW had one too many BB scholarships promised, they moved Lindsey to a NIL deal equal to his scholarship. That's how UW chooses to operate.
It is a free market. Crowl is free to do what he chooses, as is UW. So stop criticizing UW because they choose to operate with integrity.