Kidd is easily better than Redd, as is Millsap and Prince. Nene is incredibly efficient on offense and a much better defender than Redd. Fine, you may not agree on Love, I disagree. He's a monster rebounder as a rookie and as he gets older, he should improve his shooting. Although I find your reason for Love not being as good as Redd hilarious. Love racked up decent stats on a terrible team as opposed to Redd who racked up decent stats on terrible teams. Your argument for Nene is weak. He is efficient on offense because he is a big guys whose job is to clean up the glass and and get rebounds. Their efficiency rankings are actually pretty similar. Kidd is not easily better. He is as bad on defense and cannot shoot at all anymore. His assist numbers are good still but they are not in the elite level they used to be. As for Love 11 points, 9 boards, 1 assist compared to 20 points 4 boards, 3 assists are not all that similar of numbers. Those are Redd's career numbers and his past few years have had a higher point total. I do think being on a bad team helps aid your stats and that is part of the reason Redd has had good numbers, but he put up much better numbers. This is why I say being on a bad team helped Loves numbers so much. They actually have similar shooting percentages which should not be the case for a guard against a low post player. For comparison Bogut's FG % was a full tenth of a point higher than Love's. That is a huge difference and points to a guy who is not a great offensive player getting more shot than he really should in my mind. I could be way off but from the just watching the few games I do with these players that is my opinion, but like someone said in this thread these comparisons like a shooting guard to a forward are tough. I just think a lot of Bucks fans cannot stand Redd because of his contract and think he is not good because he is overpaid, but I think he is a very good (but not great and he is getting paid like a great player) player.