So many other things come into play, as I'm guessing most of the 22 teams ahead of the Brewers on the list has had at least one compensation pick within that time frame, with teams such as the Red Sox, Yankees, A's, Braves Sure, some of the teams that spent more than the Brewers had more picks, just like all 7 teams that spent less than the Brewers had less picks. The annoying part is when similar market divisional teams without extra picks like the Pirates and Reds outspend Milwaukee, and teams with somewhat significantly fewer picks, like the Cubs and Tigers, outspend the Brewers by over $3 million each. which allowed the team to sign Rolando Pascual What ever happened to the budget we used to have for signing latin players? Wasn't the idea of closing down there academy in the Dominican suppose to save money for signings like this? No, they don't go over slot value much, pretty much adhering to the commissioners office's recommendations, which is frustrating when players such as Jered Weaver, Stephen Drew and possibly Matt Wieters become available, Homer Bailey is an example here of how not paying a little over slot has burned us. The Reds were willing to pay it, and thats part of how they outspent Milwaukee without having extra picks. but pick-by-pick, they aren't cheap, as they don't reach for a player and sign them for below slot value Ya , your right, though both Jeffress and Rogers took a little less than slot, as did disappointing 3rd rounder Josh Wahpahpah, though not significant amounts. While the team hasn't had a DFE candidate that everyone is well aware of, guys like Lorenzo Cain, Darren Ford and Zach Braddock signed for more money that you may think I'd hope they would pony up to sign a few of these guys from the draft of 2004, as they originally only signed 8 players after round ten, and half of them were college seniors. 25 players total seems to usually be the bottom number of players signed, and I've counted as many as 35 a few times. I didn't take the time to count up all the signings for each team, because many of these later signings are just cheap college players, and have little impact on budgetts. I don't suppose you have the list of the teams in order with the amount they have spent? Sure, I could do that, I'll try to get it posted by the end of the week. In all, I was maybe a little harsh calling them extremely frugal. I'll just say somewhat frugal, or just unaggressive. However, I see little eveidence to call them spenders, and I really hope that changes this year, like we're hearing.