Betancourt would be tantamount to Linebrink last year, so you're giving up Salome (our third best prospect this year, paralleling our #3 last year, Inman) and probably Gillespie for Betancourt, then getting CC for Green and Charlie V? Probably won't happen, since they really don't need a pitcher who can't break our rotation, and theirs would seem to boast better depth. Also, Betancourt is just the type of bullpen arm that is overvalued by their own team, hoping for contention in the near future, which is what Cleveland considers itself doing next year. Rafael Perez might be able to be had, but would he be a sizeable upgrade? As to whether we should punk next year in hopes of this year, honestly, are we that much worse next year compared to this year, because we lose Counsell, Gagne, Mota, probably Kapler, and maybe Cameron and Sheets? Did I mention we'll be toasting Mexico's finest every fifth day, a real bull dog of a Brew? I'll concede that Branyan and, to a degree, Kapler and Kendall, have been playing over their heads, but look at the two teams above us. The Redbirds boast an outfield of Skip Schumaker, Brian Barton, and Ryan Ludwick, and that could supposedly rival ANY OF this side of Arlington? Really? Well if you believe that, then listen to this. Our friendly neighbors to the south boast the greatest rookie catcher outside of Bench and Piazza, while their rookie OF (only in the loosest sense of the word) is going to be starting in the Popularity Game, no doubt because his OBP is higher than any regular on the Brewers. Now I know that it is also grounds for "Going for it" this year, but doesn't that make you think that next year could be even better than this year? It SHOULD be better, just because our players will all be a year older and wiser. Yo for Pres' in 09! Rickie, the VP. The YO! Rickie! Ticket!