Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

nate82

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,199

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nate82

  1. nate82
    Maybe. OK how about this Steelers send 17, 32 and 49 to the Packers for Rodgers. Packers would then have 15 and 17 plus three picks in the 2nd round. The other option would be Vegas could go 7, 70 and 109. Though I think Love to the Steelers makes a little bit more sense than Rodgers. But that would mean no 1st round pick coming to the Packers and probably would be 49 and a fourth round pick in '24.
  2. nate82
    This is my the Packers trade Rodgers draft. I think I need to add more to the trading of the 5th pick to the Panthers but otherwise I think this is who the Packers would surround Love with. Watson, Doubs and Johnston would be a nice set of WR's for Love to throw to and add in Musgrave as a nice TE. Defensively the Packers would improve at DB and LB. I think the steal of the draft would be Zach Harrison in the 3rd round. He could become a very nice pass rusher for the Packers. Possible TJ Watt type of player ceiling though the floor could be out of the league in a few years. A lot of his issues come from the pre-snap as he is late a lot but good coaching should fix that.
  3. nate82
    The Packers would have to cut: Jones, Bakhtiari, Smith and O'Donnell to get to about $9m in cap space. I am not sure what that would get the Packers in FA at safety but you would have to add at least one OL, LB and RB in the draft. I think the Packers cut O'Donnell and then go with someone else as it saves the Packers about $2m in cap space. If they trade Love with all of the other cuts then that gives the Packers about $11m in cap space. I believe the Packers won't cut Bakhtiari until after 6/1 which gives them more cap space but I think that only happens if Rodgers is not on the team.
  4. nate82
    That would be a horrible trade for the Marlins. I still think Mullins for Lopez is a no brainer but apparently the O's or the Marlins don't think so.
  5. nate82
    My list: 1. Prince 2. Cooper Thats it.
  6. nate82
    1. Mitchell is the better defender in CF of all of the prospects listed so moving him to 1B would be a waste. 2. Update your autocorrect so Frelick and Wiemer come up correctly.
  7. nate82
    The Orioles wouldn't trade Hall for Houser. Hall is someone the Orioles see as a starter and not a reliever. They have placed him in the bullpen last year but they see him as a starter. You would have to include more to get Hall which is just not worth it at that point. Santander makes the most sense for a Brewers trade with the Orioles but I think they would want Lauer over Houser.
  8. nate82
    The Orioles wouldn't trade Hall for Houser. Hall is someone the Orioles see as a starter and not a reliever. They have placed him in the bullpen last year but they see him as a starter. You would have to include more to get Hall which is just not worth it at that point. Santander makes the most sense for a Brewers trade with the Orioles but I think they would want Lauer over Houser.
  9. nate82
    Probably too early for this but I did one for the Packers when I was running my mock for the Bears. Packers move back two spots and make a trade with the Steelers. I think this fills all of the Packers needs and I think they take a QB this year as I believe either Love or Rodgers will not be on the team in '23. The only one I am not sure on is Gibbs at 78. And I know you all are interested in my Bears mock!!!! This is my crazy pre draft trade with the Cardinals and Seahawks and then a draft day trade with the Falcons.
  10. nate82
    I am not saying to trade Houser just that I don't think you are going to get much in terms of value back other than some lottery tickets for him. I think you get more back by trading Lauer than you do with trading Houser but still that is either a prospect deal or someone like Santander in return.
  11. nate82
    I am not saying to trade Houser just that I don't think you are going to get much in terms of value back other than some lottery tickets for him. I think you get more back by trading Lauer than you do with trading Houser but still that is either a prospect deal or someone like Santander in return.
  12. nate82
    I think with a Houser trade you are looking more at lottery tickets. I think the Red Sox make some sense here so something like Kavadas, Perales and Rodriguez-Cruz.
  13. nate82
    I think with a Houser trade you are looking more at lottery tickets. I think the Red Sox make some sense here so something like Kavadas, Perales and Rodriguez-Cruz.
  14. nate82
    He would definitely be there at 15 and may still be available later in the first round possibly into the 2nd.
  15. nate82
    Because if you want a MLB player in return you are more than likely are going to be getting an OF over an IF based on the teams that have been rumored to be interested in starting pitchers. If the Brewers prefer prospects over MLB players then you maybe able to get an IF instead of an OF but I think the Brewers would prioritize a pitcher over a positional player if they are going the prospect route. So here are a few trades that I think are possible: Orioles get: Lauer Brewers get: Santander and one of (Comp Balance Pick/McDermott/Pinto/Rom/Gillaspie) Blue Jays get: Lauer Brewers get: Barger and Horwitz Rangers get: Lauer Brewers get: Ornelas and Bratt Yankees get: Lauer Brewers get: Beck, Beeter and Selvidge Red Sox get: Lauer Brewers get: Drohan, Rodriguez-Cruz and Seabold MLB talent wise it will be an OF as the other teams don't really have a spare IF to trade away. If you want IF it will be for a prospect. Probably the best deal would be Toronto if you are looking for an IF.
  16. nate82
    Lauer makes sense for Angels, Orioles and the Red Sox. I am not sure if there are any other matches out there. Rather small pool of teams to create a bidding war to raise his value. Right now Lauer is worth about $9-12m in surplus value. That doesn’t really get you all that much. If you want an MLB piece back then Santander is probably the best you can do. If the Brewers trade Lauer or Houser then it will be for a MLB piece. I don’t see the Brewers trading for prospects unless another FA signing is on the way.
  17. nate82
    Depends how comfortable are you with not having a physical bank to go to? Any of these are good: https://www.nerdwallet.com/best/banking/high-yield-online-savings-accounts
  18. nate82
    What about a cooler backpack instead of a cooler? Should be able to hold 30 or so cans in the backpack. So something like this: https://www.dickssportinggoods.com/p/yeti-hopper-m20-soft-backpack-cooler-22yetuhpprm20bpclrec/22yetuhpprm20bpclrec?sku=23244314
  19. nate82
    I liked most of the Avenger movies. The first Guardians of the Galaxy movie was good more of an action comedy I guess than an action movie. It is more of a nostalgia movie to be honest though with 70's and 80's references mostly. The recent movies though are mostly garbage. The recent movies have been extremely bad at setting up the characters and going through character progression. If you want a breakdown of the Marvel Movies just watch Critical Drinker on YouTube. He basically breaks everything down and where the plots make absolutely no sense at all. This is a breakdown of Phase 4. There is some colorful language used so don't listen if you are offended by that language. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rZVvSohF-Q
  20. nate82
    The Contreras trade nearly every reporter questioned Ruiz's value so I don't see how that is incorrect on the site. Ruiz's value to the A's was far higher than what most teams would have put it as and most sports writers would put it as. The owner of the site commented on the trade and was confused by what the A's were doing. The Grisham/Davies for Urias/Lauer deal was pretty close and wouldn't you want them to update the information if they believe they got it wrong on the values? The site isn't 100% accurate and it is fairly scientific on how they are coming up with their values. I believe they are about 90% accurate on their valuation. The Hader trade was very accurate on their site along with the Soto, Turner/Scherzer trade and a bunch of others were very close in value. There will always be trades that don't make sense because teams make trades that don't make sense. The Aramis Ramirez trade made no sense for the Pirates to do with the Cubs but they still made that trade. GM's and teams make dumb trades from time to time. You can't account for that in a calculation. Yes the A's made a dumb trade to acquire Ruiz. They could have acquired Ruiz in a completely separate trade but chose not to.
  21. nate82
    I only watch the ones I am interested in. Which is probably just Antman and Guardians of the Galaxy right now everything else is just a mess and horrible incoherent scripts.
  22. nate82
    That makes more sense and is annoying. I am guessing they had a big order come in and that took priority to finish at the time. I guess it would have been better for that to be late than early.
  23. nate82
    You want your food to be sitting under a heating lamp?
  24. nate82
    They have not been so so wrong on their values please provide facts if you are going to say something like that. They have been off but not by much really.
  25. nate82
    That is just a troll post on Twitter. I don't believe there is any truth to this as this is more than likely the highheat version of a sports show host.
×
×
  • Create New...