First of all Mr. Agent, all you're doing is throwing a fit to anyone who disagrees with you. Which is also what you're doing on Twitter too. You're not going to win over many hearts and minds that way. But that's all I'm going to say about that. As for all this collusion, unavoidable strike, whatever hoopla, I never see anyone talk about what is actually going to help teams be competitive. The players seem to only want more money. That's fine, I have no problem with a player getting paid as much money as they can negotiate, no matter how ridiculous that number is. The owners and a lot of other people say teams are just getting smarter with their money. I'm sure there are many owners that like that they can put a competitive team on the field and not spend a lot of money of it. But when you have one side saying "Collusion! Pay us more!" and on the other side you have teams like Milwaukee, Oakland, and Tampa Bay on shoe string budgets being competitive and getting all star performances at clearance prices while teams like Baltimore, San Francisco, and the Angels have albatross contracts on teams going nowhere, I'm going to side the with those that are at least giving the illusion of trying to be competitive. Having said that, players need to be getting paid more early in their career, if they deserve it. The fact that in his first two full MLB seasons Mike Trout OPS'd near 1.000 and was paid only $1M is beyond ridiculous. Even Travis Shaw, back to back 30 HR seasons, OPS around .850 and he's not even making $5M this year. Pay the guys when they are in their prime and are worth it.