Interesting deal. Credit to somebody (MattYo, I think) who actually called the trade on here before it was in the media. It’s not popular, but I’d hang on to Arcia. He is still young and I don’t think it makes sense to sell low unless he’s a locker room problem. I don’t believe that’s the case at all based on how the players interact. He’s warmly received out in the open by the other players. There’s talent in Arcia and I think much of his issues can be traced to immaturity (dumb approach at the plate, no improvement, lack of hustle and concentration). He can still be a utility infielder and bring defense late, etc. Counsell is not shy about in-game chess moves, and Arcia can play into that. Competition has come in, hopefully to supplant him. If that doesn’t light a fire under his rear end, nothing will. Urias’ prospect pedigree is essentially comparable to what Arcia’s was at the same stage. For a variety of these reasons, I don’t move him. Lauer doesn’t move the needle much for me but he may have the exact profile of a guy who is about to take a step forward based on his first round pedigree, fast ride through the minors, and strong experience for his age. That’s the type of guy who could possibly jump up. We will have to see. I see a lot of skepticism on Grisham. I don’t think it’s the overwhelming steal being touted. Grisham took a big step forward and if you look at his skill set, this is a guy who can bring a lot of juice to the lineup. If Corey Ray can put it together this year, long term, he can fill that Grisham role. Ray has shown himself to be an extra base machine if he can turn the corner. Unlike Grisham, though, Ray is more of the hot streak/cold streak guy as opposed to a guy who’s put it together and turned the corner.