Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Jopal78

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,202

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jopal78

  1. Jopal78
    Yeah maybe, but Canha and Santana certainly do not make the Brewers stronger against Atlanta or Los Angeles and even in the best light make the Brewers only marginally more likely to win their division. Really, I think the front office knows that this year’s roster is flawed, yet reached the conclusion that while it’s worth making an investment to improve the roster, they’re only willing to invest enough to make incremental improvements. I just don’t see much point in adding short term players who most likely don’t change the course of the season this year. If the roster is flawed fix it, or retool for ‘24.
  2. Jopal78
    Yes I know by them, I meant Woodruff and Burnes. I could’ve worded that differently
  3. Jopal78
    Guess that goes to show you what Canha’s value was. Mets had to pay 3-4 million to get a middling pitching prospect in return, and presumably that was their best offer.
  4. Jopal78
    I’m not convinced the Brewers won’t simply run it back next year with Woodruff, Burnes and Peralta, make them QOs and take the pick. Sell more tickets that way.
  5. Jopal78
    That was the swing that got him to the majors.
  6. Jopal78
    Yes, but you got to beat the easy teams
  7. Jopal78
    With heightened expectations come increased disappointment. If this was 2005 folks would be thrilled they were even “buyers”-because what that means- regardless of whom the players were
  8. Jopal78
    Horrid take, but you didn’t say it’s not true.
  9. Jopal78
    Burnes, Woodruff, and Peralta there’s your difference. The Brewers had 3 strong starting pitchers hit the majors at the same time. The Cubs don’t. The Brewers are not terribly run but I sure wouldn’t consider them amongst the best run clubs small or large market. Case in point they develop three all star starting pitchers at the same time and they’ve won 2 playoff series with them and that was nearly 5 years ago. Hell they missed the playoffs all together last year with some of the NL’s best starting pitching. Talk about less with more. They have not developed a starting pitcher since Burnes, they haven’t developed an above average home grown hitter in a decade, they’ve ended up releasing virtually every free agent they’ve signed to a multi-year deal in the last decade before their contract was up. Now with dwindling control of those ace pitchers they’re hesitant to be bold about bolstering their lineup to aid their chances, and at the same time are flushing the amount of future return of those aces the longer they hang on to them.
  10. Jopal78
    Lame. How come the Rays have more wins than the Brewers with a smaller payroll?
  11. Jopal78
    “Massive” no. An upgrade from bad to mediocre, sure. The again what playoff team bolsters the middle of the their lineup with a collection of sun .730 OPS hitters. It’s a team without a direction, they won’t make the moves to narrow the talent gap between them and the stronger teams in their league, and they won’t sell their valuable assets to try to field a stronger team in the future. Just content at being “good enough” to maybe win a bad division.
  12. Jopal78
    Santana and now Canha, The ‘23 Brewer sure have an affinity for .720 OPS hitters on other teams.
  13. Jopal78
    I guess we have different definitions of needle mover.
  14. Jopal78
    Woodruff.
  15. Jopal78
    I guess that’s my point, folks are dogging Civale as not being a needle mover etc. He’s literally Yovani Gallardo already in terms of FIP and could still get better.
  16. Jopal78
    Yep and with a 4.05 FIP he’ll pitch in the big leagues for a decade.
  17. Jopal78
    Funny the comments about Civale and being a non-difference maker. His bWAR this year is better than Burnes, Scherzer and Giolito. In fact Civale isn’t too far off from Brandon Woodruff walks allowed per 9 and homers. He just hasn’t struck out as many and gives up one more hit per 9.
  18. Jopal78
    What does being a poor defender or DH only have to do with anything? Positional players make their money based on what they do at the plate. Besides that, Paul Molitor stayed healthy, had his best production and punched his ticket to the Hall of Fame as a DH only-maybe Jimenez too would have a jump in production not having to deal with nagging injuries from playing the field. Bottom line, I doubt the Brewers and White Sox hook up for a trade on Jimenez, because the Sox will justifiably want some premium talent back for a myriad of reasons: ‘23 is a seller’s market, Jimenez is a good hitter, just 26 and cost controlled for years. I doubt they’d accept some quantity over quality deal just to move him. Likewise, the Brewers almost never move their best prospects in deadline deals.
  19. Jopal78
    You’re right, the name was familiar, Tellez trade, but I didn’t remember he made the majors.
  20. Jopal78
    It’s kind of getting off topic, but have they flipped the switch on pitching? All the credit in the world is deserved for Burnes, Woodruff and Peralta, but a pipeline of pitchers hasn’t really developed since 2016 more of a single spurt. Pitchers Stearns drafted ‘16-‘20 that made the majors: Burnes, Alec Bettinger, Ashby, Rasmussen, Clayton Andrews and Ethan Small. Bettinger is already out of baseball. Andrews and Small haven’t demonstrated the necessary command to stick in the majors. Ashby had one good year, one not so good year and suffered a major shoulder injury so who knows what they have there.
  21. Jopal78
    If Jimenez is a borderline salary dump why would the Brewers want him? Moreover, look at the multi year deals being signed by outfielders recently: Avi Garcia got 4 years 53 million before the ‘22 season. Michael Conforto got 2 yrs 36 million, Benintendi got 5 years 75 million. Mitch Haniger got 3 yrs 44 million. Unless teams are dumpster diving for one year bandaids they can’t sign a starting outfielder in today’s game for less than 15 million per. Thus, Jimenez’s club options are not as worthless as one believes. Now if you’re saying the Brewers have tepid interest because they don’t want to add anymore market rate player contracts, that’s a concept I would get behind.
  22. Jopal78
    Yup, a bunch of guys (Lucroy, Brantley and Cain) from over a decade ago; two of whom are already retired. Nobody can say what they have in this year’s crop (Turang, Mitchell, Wiemer, Frelick), they could be great, or just as equally they could be the next Brad Nelson, Taylor Green. All we can say right now is the next Ryan Braun they are not. We do know that in 14 months, once you in a generation starters Burnes and Woodruff will be gone. So the question is what they do while they still have them? Right now it seems to me, not much besides having the starting pitchers will them into the post season.
  23. Jopal78
    I get being reluctant to deal top prospects but the Brewers are not the Dodgers or Rays when it comes to drafting, who was the last hitter they drafted that turned out to be somebody? At some point they have to decide they’re “all in” while they have thr great starting pitchers, or they should start the sell off and build for 2025
  24. Jopal78
    I think Santana is probably it for name players at the deadline; they’ll probably add another Daniel Norris, John Curtiss, Matt Bush type of deliver but I’m not expecting much, given a seller’s market and the “buying responsibly” mantra.
  25. Jopal78
    Or when you’re a pitching and defense team and you don’t pitch well (25 runs, 10 homers in 3 games) you don’t win.
×
×
  • Create New...