Prior to Melvin's arrival the Brewers had gone 10 years since their last winning season & 20 years since their last playoff season. They were already in the ground. Melvin (& Mark A) made the franchise relevant again & hopefully Stearns can take us to the next level. I certainly don't view his seeming refusal thus far to budge from what he feels is appropriate value in negotiations as a weakness. I would say that it is definitely fair to assess that Melvin both made the Brewers relevant and then attempted to hold on to an aging core too long before rebuilding. That could definitely be construed as running the franchise into the ground by some. Melvin and atanasio never wanted to have a rebuild or punt year, and that probably delayed the rebuild a bit too long. That's okay, he had some success..... it just feels like most folks tend to look at these things in very black and white manners. 2011 was a huge success, imo. While he gave up great talent to get Sabathia and Greinke, I would not consider those "running into the ground"-type moves. Greinke had an extra year of control when traded for (and they hoped to be able to resign him), and the return for Sabathia ended up being not all that great (Brantley was not a top prospect at the time). Heck, after what Brewer fans went through in the '90s and early 2000s, Doug Melvin should be canonized in Milwaukee. He brought a winner back, and even though they have had a couple down years since that run, this team has never been uninteresting.